hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Release 0.90.3 soon?
Date Tue, 17 May 2011 01:28:56 GMT
We were discussing release of 0.91 off of trunk.

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Gaojinchao <gaojinchao@huawei.com> wrote:

> I can do some test for 0.90.X if it needs.
>
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: jdcryans@gmail.com [mailto:jdcryans@gmail.com] 代表 Jean-Daniel Cryans
> 发送时间: 2011年5月17日 2:31
> 收件人: dev@hbase.apache.org
> 主题: Re: Release 0.90.3 soon?
>
> Run the unit tests, try it on a handful of machines, basically just
> make sure it's usable.
>
> J-D
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I assume release manager has to be a committer. So, although I want to
> help
> > ...
> >
> > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> >> We cut cut a 0.91 now as Todd suggests but would need a release
> >> manager to run the release.
> >> St.Ack
> >>
> >> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Barney Frank's request for help brought me back to this discussion.
> >> > When would 0.91 release come ?
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I am looking forward to this 0.91 release.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Todd Lipcon <todd@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> > When would 0.91 branch be created ?
> >> >>> > We should reduce the number of open critical bugs for 0.90
- each
> >> such
> >> >>> > issue
> >> >>> > would soon be integrated to 3 branches after 0.91 branch is
> created.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Sorry, I should have been clear that I would imagine 0.91 would
be a
> >> "dev
> >> >>> release" series like 0.89. That is to say, there would be no 0.91
> >> branch,
> >> >>> just a few "snapshot style" releases with minimal pre-release
> testing
> >> to
> >> >>> get
> >> >>> us in shape for 92. These releases would never have point releases
> done
> >> on
> >> >>> top (and thus not need to have changes backported to them one
> >> released).
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Consider it another name for an extended release candidate period
> for
> >> >>> 0.92.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> -Todd
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Todd Lipcon <todd@cloudera.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > > Maybe we should do an 0.91 dev release tout de suite?
Folks who
> >> want
> >> >>> > > 3777 and coprocessors and the other nice stuff can then
help us
> >> bake
> >> >>> > > towards 92 ?
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > Todd
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > On Tuesday, May 3, 2011, Stack <stack@duboce.net>
wrote:
> >> >>> > > > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>> > > >> After discussion below, I wonder if 0.92.0RC
would come out
> >> before
> >> >>> > > 0.90.4
> >> >>> > > >> I hope that's the case - we're looking forward
to coprocessor
> >> which
> >> >>> > > wouldn't
> >> >>> > > >> be in 0.90.x anyway.
> >> >>> > > >>
> >> >>> > > >
> >> >>> > > > Plan is to put up a 0.92.0 'soon', in the next week
or so.
>  I'm
> >> not
> >> >>> > > > sure when 0.90.4 will see light of day.  There's
a good few
> >> blockers
> >> >>> > > > and criticals but if a few of us have a go at them,
we'll
> knock
> >> it
> >> >>> out
> >> >>> > > > tout de suite (This is what I'm working on at mo).
> >> >>> > > >
> >> >>> > > > Good stuff,
> >> >>> > > > St.Ack
> >> >>> > > >
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > --
> >> >>> > > Todd Lipcon
> >> >>> > > Software Engineer, Cloudera
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> Todd Lipcon
> >> >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message