hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: Release 0.90.3 soon?
Date Mon, 16 May 2011 18:02:10 GMT
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> We cut cut a 0.91 now as Todd suggests but would need a release
> manager to run the release.
>

I would support such a release but unfortunatelty I don't have time to
volunteer to be an RM :(

-Todd


>  On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Barney Frank's request for help brought me back to this discussion.
> > When would 0.91 release come ?
> >
> > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I am looking forward to this 0.91 release.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Todd Lipcon <todd@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > When would 0.91 branch be created ?
> >>> > We should reduce the number of open critical bugs for 0.90 - each
> such
> >>> > issue
> >>> > would soon be integrated to 3 branches after 0.91 branch is created.
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> Sorry, I should have been clear that I would imagine 0.91 would be a
> "dev
> >>> release" series like 0.89. That is to say, there would be no 0.91
> branch,
> >>> just a few "snapshot style" releases with minimal pre-release testing
> to
> >>> get
> >>> us in shape for 92. These releases would never have point releases done
> on
> >>> top (and thus not need to have changes backported to them one
> released).
> >>>
> >>> Consider it another name for an extended release candidate period for
> >>> 0.92.
> >>>
> >>> -Todd
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Todd Lipcon <todd@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > Maybe we should do an 0.91 dev release tout de suite? Folks who
> want
> >>> > > 3777 and coprocessors and the other nice stuff can then help us
> bake
> >>> > > towards 92 ?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Todd
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Tuesday, May 3, 2011, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >>> > > > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> > > >> After discussion below, I wonder if 0.92.0RC would come
out
> before
> >>> > > 0.90.4
> >>> > > >> I hope that's the case - we're looking forward to coprocessor
> which
> >>> > > wouldn't
> >>> > > >> be in 0.90.x anyway.
> >>> > > >>
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Plan is to put up a 0.92.0 'soon', in the next week or so.
 I'm
> not
> >>> > > > sure when 0.90.4 will see light of day.  There's a good few
> blockers
> >>> > > > and criticals but if a few of us have a go at them, we'll
knock
> it
> >>> out
> >>> > > > tout de suite (This is what I'm working on at mo).
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Good stuff,
> >>> > > > St.Ack
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > --
> >>> > > Todd Lipcon
> >>> > > Software Engineer, Cloudera
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Todd Lipcon
> >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message