Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 83881 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2011 22:15:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Feb 2011 22:15:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 24736 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2011 22:15:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 24678 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2011 22:15:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 24670 invoked by uid 99); 28 Feb 2011 22:15:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:15:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.169] (HELO mail-wy0-f169.google.com) (74.125.82.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:15:23 +0000 Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so5232788wyi.14 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:15:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=frNwO9fR5iM8tdqbBEHi/E8xo9NRCxzCFjohkY7kVzc=; b=Q99qQ1Fpb4ZCihOT5LuFyMwokOAOTsKtPuswMA1MHCzOEou3ajhw+bITyC9wF8Al43 fXbDrvaK0mHEnM13mSyNhmdUJZVDdwyDrbwcV4XthQ37cR3BbbeAgxuaAQpXQ2h/SZQz yMMVMNY/5zKN8+jOpiv214n+ot3ZMWOb9circ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=OLTWsdbRUHhwPTMhk10bFdATCnh03vUX7T1KHlhT3ExeIBYD5lxru66q2fPRPHvcnX qfvNaOM5JSBAVP7vWc1fxspkU5OVaUDZqVQpivOfkyi8o/MFxCOSh37BMWof1rfYXqA6 NfuEgD+q/3P12EEKDrvKXzMWHeKOQiWOq6/Ks= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.28.19 with SMTP id f19mr5015019wea.88.1298931301120; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:15:01 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.54.16 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:15:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <613513.96957.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:15:01 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: vcw_OKk-08sFwJ0fEv_Pn3zgSF4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: putting a border around 0.92 release From: Stack To: dev@hbase.apache.org Cc: Ryan Rawson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Yeah, time-based. May 1st for 0.92 branch! +1 on big changes out on branch keeping trunk relatively releasable at all times. I like your list J-D. 0.92 should run on hadoop-0.20 through hadoop trunk at time of our 0.92 branch. If all are good w/ that, lets do a pass over 0.92 issues so its reflective of what we think we might do in the 0.92 timeframe (will help Lars too). St.Ack