Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates
 209.85.210.169 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=SLPGRiWOE/NWrZF8XGmCwyj2t6rnzsNoAGt06dVqMKdKxBD/+05iolh9+cMzg18Rq0
         YGu+wMAvzFwZKbHGj+utOyqeLWrxGS07eg/J1VBihDNriH626ekcjlaFa5TUO/f37Gue
         g012YAgJ0Ymp4lczUb27ynvIoTrSP2nG38bSs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTindMZYNhEoYScFr+e4pjnmovq8Svy-CHmPGuv8e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikE9wXp2Ffc1Be51fS7AK70VsYv29hVHnrg-2=S@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTindMZYNhEoYScFr+e4pjnmovq8Svy-CHmPGuv8e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:34:20 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=-tjmaF_k8QeMefAt_p7dkYgMi7TW=A7MWy5V3@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Build patched cdh3b2
From: Ryan Rawson <ryanobjc@gmail.com>
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

my jar looks like:

-rw-r--r--  1 hadoop hadoop 2861459 2011-02-09 16:34 hadoop-core-0.20.2+322=
.jar

-ryan

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Ryan Rawson <ryanobjc@gmail.com> wrote:
> I put up the patch I used, I then changed the version to 0.20.2-322
> and just did ant jar. I crippled the forrest crap in build.xml... I
> didnt check the filesize of the resulting jar though.
>
> -ryan
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ryan:
>> Can you share how you built patched cdh3b2 ?
>>
>> When I used 'ant jar', I got build/hadoop-core-0.20.2-CDH3b2-SNAPSHOT.ja=
r
>> which was much larger than the official hadoop-core-0.20.2+320.jar
>> hadoop had trouble starting if I used hadoop-core-0.20.2-CDH3b2-SNAPSHOT=
.jar
>> in place of official jar.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Ryan Rawson <ryanobjc@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I am generally +1, but we'll need another RC to address HBASE-3524.
>>>
>>> Here is some of my other report of running this:
>>>
>>> Been running a variant of this found here:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/stumbleupon/hbase/tree/su_prod_90
>>>
>>> Running in "dev" here at SU now.
>>>
>>> Also been testing that against our Hadoop CDH3b2 patched in with
>>> HDFS-347. =A0In uncontended YCSB runs this did improve much 'get'
>>> numbers, but in a 15 thread contended test the average get time goes
>>> from 12.1 ms -> 6.9ms. =A0We plan to test this more and roll in to our
>>> production environment. =A0With 0.90.1 + a number of our patches,
>>> Hadoopw/347 I loaded 30gb in using YCSB.
>>>
>>> Still working on getting VerifyingWorkload to run and verify this
>>> data. But no exceptions.
>>>
>>> -ryan
>>>
>>>
>>
>