hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Build patched cdh3b2
Date Sat, 12 Feb 2011 06:35:23 GMT
Is it possible for you to share the hadoop-core-0.20.2+320.jar that you
built ?

Thanks

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Ryan Rawson <ryanobjc@gmail.com> wrote:

> I put up the patch I used, I then changed the version to 0.20.2-322
> and just did ant jar. I crippled the forrest crap in build.xml... I
> didnt check the filesize of the resulting jar though.
>
> -ryan
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Ryan:
> > Can you share how you built patched cdh3b2 ?
> >
> > When I used 'ant jar', I got build/hadoop-core-0.20.2-CDH3b2-SNAPSHOT.jar
> > which was much larger than the official hadoop-core-0.20.2+320.jar
> > hadoop had trouble starting if I used
> hadoop-core-0.20.2-CDH3b2-SNAPSHOT.jar
> > in place of official jar.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Ryan Rawson <ryanobjc@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I am generally +1, but we'll need another RC to address HBASE-3524.
> >>
> >> Here is some of my other report of running this:
> >>
> >> Been running a variant of this found here:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/stumbleupon/hbase/tree/su_prod_90
> >>
> >> Running in "dev" here at SU now.
> >>
> >> Also been testing that against our Hadoop CDH3b2 patched in with
> >> HDFS-347.  In uncontended YCSB runs this did improve much 'get'
> >> numbers, but in a 15 thread contended test the average get time goes
> >> from 12.1 ms -> 6.9ms.  We plan to test this more and roll in to our
> >> production environment.  With 0.90.1 + a number of our patches,
> >> Hadoopw/347 I loaded 30gb in using YCSB.
> >>
> >> Still working on getting VerifyingWorkload to run and verify this
> >> data. But no exceptions.
> >>
> >> -ryan
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message