hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <tdunn...@maprtech.com>
Subject Re: Hypertable claiming upto >900% random-read throughput vs HBase
Date Wed, 15 Dec 2010 19:15:15 GMT
>From the small comments I have heard, the RAM versus disk difference is
mostly what I have heard they were testing.

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Ryan Rawson <ryanobjc@gmail.com> wrote:

> We dont have the test source code, so it isnt very objective.  However
> I believe there are 2 things which help them:
> - They are able to harness larger amounts of RAM, so they are really
> just testing that vs HBase

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message