hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: hbck tool
Date Tue, 28 Dec 2010 23:12:45 GMT
Yikes, that will give operators fits. 

Best regards,

    - Andy


--- On Tue, 12/28/10, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> From: Stack <stack@duboce.net>
> Subject: Re: hbck tool
> To: dev@hbase.apache.org
> Date: Tuesday, December 28, 2010, 12:40 PM
> Give it a while.  Unfortunately
> hbck has chicken-little aspects
> thinking the world has ended though a condition is
> transient.  That
> said, add a -details flag and see if what its complaining
> about looks
> legit.  Or wait a while and see if the condition
> passes (run it a few
> more times).
> 
> Thanks for trying the new RC Ted.
> St.Ack
> 
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I ran hbck in 0.90 on tables generated by 0.20.6:
> >
> > ...
> >  packageindex is okay.
> >    Number of regions: 20
> >    Deployed on:
>  sjc1-hadoop3.sjc1.carrieriq.com:60020
> > sjc1-hadoop9.sjc1.carrieriq.com:60020
> > 187 inconsistencies detected.
> > Status: INCONSISTENT
> >
> > I tried -fix option but the output seems to be the
> same.
> >
> > Any comment ?
> >
> 


      

Mime
View raw message