Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 92870 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 00:06:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2010 00:06:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 50965 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 00:06:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 50940 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 00:06:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 38432 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 23:57:18 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=10.0 tests=FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Review Request: Tool to verify data in two clusters From: "Jean-Daniel Cryans" To: "Jean-Daniel Cryans" , jiraposter@review.hbase.org, dev@hbase.apache.org, stack@duboce.net Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:56:50 -0000 Message-ID: <20101028235650.785.53304@ip-10-202-7-187.ec2.internal> In-Reply-To: <20101028235220.786.76078@ip-10-202-7-187.ec2.internal> References: <20101028235220.786.76078@ip-10-202-7-187.ec2.internal> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > On 2010-10-28 16:52:20, stack wrote: > > Excellent. Minor items to address on commit. So, is this new fancy to= ol doc'd in replication notes? I think it kinda critical. Would suggest o= pening a doc issue against 0.90 to mention presence of this tool in the rep= lication chapter.... if only a sentence. Thanks for the comments, integrating them. I'll add a note in the replicati= on documentation for the website. - Jean-Daniel ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://review.cloudera.org/r/1111/#review1693 ----------------------------------------------------------- On 2010-10-28 16:42:25, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: > = > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://review.cloudera.org/r/1111/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > = > (Updated 2010-10-28 16:42:25) > = > = > Review request for hbase. > = > = > Summary > ------- > = > This new mapreduce job called VerifyReplication compares the data between= two clusters that are replication-enabled. Its usage is relatively simple = when you already use replication, and even let's you pass the peer id inste= ad of the cluster key for the target cluster. > = > = > This addresses bug HBASE-3013. > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3013 > = > = > Diffs > ----- > = > /trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/mapreduce/Driver.java 1028= 470 = > /trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/mapreduce/replication/Veri= fyReplication.java PRE-CREATION = > /trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/replication/ReplicationZoo= keeper.java 1028470 = > /trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/replication/TestReplicatio= n.java 1028470 = > = > Diff: http://review.cloudera.org/r/1111/diff > = > = > Testing > ------- > = > Unit test (one new included) and this has been running for a month here. > = > = > Thanks, > = > Jean-Daniel > = >