Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 55929 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2010 18:42:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Oct 2010 18:42:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 13391 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 18:42:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 13353 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 18:42:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 13345 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2010 18:42:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 18:42:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.6.228.83] (HELO n11.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (74.6.228.83) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 18:42:13 +0000 Received: from [76.13.12.64] by n11.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Oct 2010 18:41:52 -0000 Received: from [76.13.10.164] by t5.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Oct 2010 18:41:52 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp105.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Oct 2010 18:41:52 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 405003.5900.bm@omp105.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 47337 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Oct 2010 18:41:52 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1286390512; bh=AUtY3veG31QyKi04dyJOnBUm6pPlzmS+G92SXvHIQzs=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=dnX0VdmgNHO6FrGN0GcWnvcN8zgnvfGd/SqRaICTlZjoVsqilMvOFbBM926TDOsxFw6v5xGrj5t+9JDxEWiPcx4KNAtpMZbqhfVM9b1U3/XTWx6l/HqUddimWy/Y7qkgIvANfHU3G9kSZ0WMDTMWBSV78U5RvqEEAEbikSFD2H0= Message-ID: <153669.47324.qm@web65502.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: Nv_yv2YVM1l6LIjiGB4IW6GppOTwp9_7aRVLSJg3dfnuYlL i8Gzc4sPNhR0WBrPf04u8qfUJBVPFjL5LwrhnmPZAljj_.RAiEou48IkpIWG lQWrB79g5oya.04xYF49cLhBwWQWVHeEN84xI3McIO7oIxIG1TSE5gyJ0MVU DuRlDrPPaJbA0yxkdCi_qsXZyr_.dxI1lST9tI8_YDgOl79SpLaNBeOfCuwL yK7AV_F7O3OGS02noLKP08QiGN9k2Pwf4D6l1LImNdckq.2wp.SrHYBjUwCh e6jJnbqUa4UZP8ho0m0U1s89rbGM8cNz88.a26cBVY4Cs_SXUp.IcHrcV2u. 9SN1pV0TtbQ-- Received: from [69.111.79.82] by web65502.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:41:51 PDT X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.9 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:41:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Purtell Reply-To: apurtell@apache.org Subject: Re: dynamic RPC and coprocessor changes To: dev@hbase.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well, three +0 is enough to resolve this discussion I think. =0A=0A> From: = stack=0A>=0A> My preference would be to not include CP in 0.90.=0A> =0A> If= 'exposure' is the justification for getting CP into 0.90=0A> and it is adm= ittedly still malleable -- is this right? --=0A> subject to change and 'exp= erimental', doesn't it better=0A> belong in TRUNK post a 0.90 branch? We co= uld commit as soon=0A> as end-of-day today if was wanted?=A0 Having it in b= ranch=0A> brings exposure and shows hbase projects committment to CP?=0A=0A= Since this appears to be the best possible outcome for us, we'll take it.= =0A=0A - Andy=0A=0A=0A=0A