hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: dynamic RPC and coprocessor changes
Date Wed, 06 Oct 2010 18:41:51 GMT
Well, three +0 is enough to resolve this discussion I think. 

> From: stack
>
> My preference would be to not include CP in 0.90.
> 
> If 'exposure' is the justification for getting CP into 0.90
> and it is admittedly still malleable -- is this right? --
> subject to change and 'experimental', doesn't it better
> belong in TRUNK post a 0.90 branch? We could commit as soon
> as end-of-day today if was wanted?  Having it in branch
> brings exposure and shows hbase projects committment to CP?

Since this appears to be the best possible outcome for us, we'll take it.

   - Andy



      


Mime
View raw message