Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 23516 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2010 00:15:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Sep 2010 00:15:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 31460 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2010 00:15:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 31350 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2010 00:15:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 31342 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2010 00:15:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:15:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jdcryans@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.169] (HELO mail-iw0-f169.google.com) (209.85.214.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:15:04 +0000 Received: by iwn33 with SMTP id 33so7291757iwn.14 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:14:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=oPqS8nbGNvysL9xYuYt+nBdPCqekRCQlP+w7tbLScr8=; b=U9oVu2cm+CQhF3xknsrUmSpHicqVGMaW9H53idJhcCfhBCvH++l7MBKH2v2RE4yTd7 qYTtJXqTRS4/IQzTGRAIfpm8UA8WyNxQp1210MKaK1cWQVjaILvxVHvVDvGNfC4XBh9O fDohl1PUm/i+TV7jfmbM5MeyJhcoyR9vMms5w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=VnjoAxn7+U99CM0XZjJ+IuaZjegrGKiJfngse/cAxe6Q8QVQe19xTkeAgVbMxGyqg8 jtg4W9UDN5BCtSI5DO9DBjGu5X2Wz00fS01Nnnomww1RZYtGJJDDchDi/NJjlEqNVnd0 smPQ2AlQD2RjvBij7cI2b7e+9xrO/0PJXIui4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.80.213 with SMTP id u21mr6736138ibk.173.1284423282195; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:14:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: jdcryans@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.206.84 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:14:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:14:42 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1rVNExe-QEsolh4p-CoW9WNfnzQ Message-ID: Subject: [VOTE] Release 'development release' HBase 0.89.2010830 rc2? From: Jean-Daniel Cryans To: dev@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Second RC, new vote! Source binary and source tar balls are available here: http://people.apache.org/~jdcryans/hbase-0.89.20100830-candidate-2/ You can also browse the candidate documentation here: http://people.apache.org/~jdcryans/hbase-0.89.20100830-candidate-2/hbase-0.89.20100830/docs/ Issues resolved since 0.89.20100726, our second 0.89.x release, are roughly ~23 issues odd including fixed deadlocks, better handling of IOEs during splits and improvements for filters: see http://su.pr/2HwiUe. 3 issues were also fixed for RC2: HBASE-2975 DFSClient names in master and RS should be unique HBASE-2967 Failed split: IOE 'File is Corrupt' -- sync length not being written out to SequenceFile HBASE-2964 Deadlock when RS tries to RPC to itself inside SplitTransaction Shall we release this candidate as the third in our 0.89.x series of developer releases? Please see previous threads on 0.89 releases for more information about the purpose of this release candidate - in particular, this 'developer release' is for those who can tolerate risk and who are willing to give feedback in advance of our next major release. We're not making any guarantees that this is bug free. Its definitely not for production deploys. We'll do another release like this in a few weeks after the new master code has gone in. Please vote by Thursday, September 16th. Thanks, J-D