Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 93203 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2010 23:22:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Sep 2010 23:22:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 58343 invoked by uid 500); 24 Sep 2010 23:22:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 58265 invoked by uid 500); 24 Sep 2010 23:22:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 58257 invoked by uid 99); 24 Sep 2010 23:22:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:22:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.169] (HELO mail-wy0-f169.google.com) (74.125.82.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:21:57 +0000 Received: by wyb36 with SMTP id 36so4299012wyb.14 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:21:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=L1VvJnGGO2I7VeT0okcO2J6/RkXHvMxS8PGVJDnMIS4=; b=t8nHNlx4yDiWPKbuvlLxg2P4dkWVKhphqgFsHLZ3Voy8/u5N3h7TRTU0naO9k6HFT5 lsUyS18s0JrNkDCN+3dGRYulKnqFzJnfee1W8XowFLKXRLFx/qyG/oq+VondZoSBUWYp VepssVS/d4C6c1Zc8bfUHaXuTWKzsdfwk6LU0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=My2WS7NctGiQzLpeq7x8u3cGD/aBUQJIf13vbDOPtGoaZV3cRS4riKXJKpMRLRFbEg id6cvCdwuxRnEBg7fm8A090Oyg3impdi/vgAQ6bZczjKfYntHpTjuDh0K2jdi/omUkqL JIe2MoF2MdUCfb7ZLnp2VrVEbRWcHlVG5V3e0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.137.211 with SMTP id x19mr3643393wbt.32.1285370495929; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:21:35 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.158.149 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:21:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:21:35 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: NfWtwvbivbMGKQ1wqHFVh9H2c9s Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 'development release' HBase 0.89.2010924 rc1? From: Stack To: dev@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable -1 (Sorry). We need HBASE-2986. Without it client hangs if a split in the midst of a put. Otherwise, I'd already checked it out -- doc looks good, ran under load on a cluster -- and would have +1'd it only for your calling out the absence of HBASE-2986 J-D. St.Ack On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans w= rote: > The 0.89.20100830 DR branch was cancelled, here's the new RC off a new br= anch. > > As discussed, this release candidate contains a revert of HBASE-2694 > which means that it is back on the "very" old master. It is also very > similar to what we run here in production. > > Sources and binaries can be found here: > > http://people.apache.org/~jdcryans/hbase-0.89.20100924-candidate-1/ > > Documentation: > > http://people.apache.org/~jdcryans/hbase-0.89.20100924-candidate-1/hbase-= 0.89.20100924/docs/ > > Here's the list of everything I added since moving from 0830: > > =A0HBASE-3008 =A0Memstore.updateColumnValue passes wrong flag to heapSize= Change > =A0HBASE-3035 =A0Bandaid for HBASE-2990 > =A0HBASE-2643 =A0Figure how to deal with eof splitting logs > =A0HBASE-2941 =A0port HADOOP-6713 - threading scalability for RPC reads -= to HBase > =A0HBASE-3006 =A0Reading compressed HFile blocks causes way too many DFS = RPC calls > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 severly impacting performance > =A0HBASE-2989 =A0[replication] RSM won't cleanup after locking if 0 peers > =A0HBASE-2992 =A0[replication] MalformedObjectNameException in Replicatio= nMetrics > =A0HBASE-3034 =A0Revert the regions assignment part of HBASE-2694 (and > pals) for 0.89 > =A0HBASE-3033 =A0[replication] ReplicationSink.replicateEntries improveme= nts > =A0HBASE-2997 =A0Performance fixes - profiler driven > =A0HBASE-2889 =A0Tool to look at HLogs -- parse and tail -f (patch #2 onl= y) > > Unfortunately I forgot to add HBASE-2986 like Stack asked (sorry, I > just figured it while reading the old voting thread). > > Should we release this as the next "Development Release"? Please cast > your vote by Wednesday, September 29th. > > Thanks, > > The HBase Team >