Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jgray@facebook.com designates
 69.63.178.181 as permitted sender)
From: Jonathan Gray <jgray@facebook.com>
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>, "apurtell@apache.org"
	<apurtell@apache.org>
Subject: RE: old master to 0.90 and new master to 0.92? (was RE: Millions of
 photos into Hbase)
Thread-Topic: old master to 0.90 and new master to 0.92? (was RE: Millions
 of photos into Hbase)
Thread-Index: 
 AQHLWbQ/SFRhgeNxZU+ZmPhG38BXBpMdkn8AgABhlaCAAMAtgIAAU8uAgAAA9gCAAADRgIAAOMBQ
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:50:34 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <5A76F6CE309AD049AAF9A039A39242820F018047@sc-mbx04.TheFacebook.com>
References: <AANLkTikTUYxKMELmc9kQu=YBJBUBb_3pTexh-HJPUUdH@mail.gmail.com>
 <139572.37021.qm@web65511.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <139572.37021.qm@web65511.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

Yes, there are way more changes/improvements made beyond the initial scope =
of working master failover / zk-based region transitions.  Lots of cleanup,=
 removal of many of the nasty bits we've always hated, and the groundwork i=
s laid for a lot of future improvements.

I'm not apprehensive.  I think many of the points raised are valid, but my =
concerns have mostly been addressed at this point.  I'm going to be spendin=
g the next 10 days or so helping stabilize and test.  We'll see where we ge=
t by then.

JG
=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Purtell [mailto:apurtell@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 3:47 AM
> To: dev@hbase.apache.org
> Subject: Re: old master to 0.90 and new master to 0.92? (was RE:
> Millions of photos into Hbase)
>=20
> Thanks. I'm going to try it out right away.
>=20
> > From: Ryan Rawson
> > I've been using the new master a bit, and the improvements are just
> > too dramatic to ignore or delay.=A0 Instant table transitions, clusters
> > that actually shut down, etc, etc.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > If JG is apprehensive about putting the new master
> > into 0.90, that's good enough for me. But I'll vote +0. I'm
> > too unfamiliar with the details.
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20