hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stack <st...@duboce.net>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release 'development release' HBase 0.89.2010924 rc1?
Date Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:21:35 GMT
-1 (Sorry).  We need HBASE-2986.  Without it client hangs if a split
in the midst of a put.

Otherwise, I'd already checked it out -- doc looks good, ran under
load on a cluster -- and would have +1'd it only for your calling out
the absence of HBASE-2986 J-D.

St.Ack


On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcryans@apache.org> wrote:
> The 0.89.20100830 DR branch was cancelled, here's the new RC off a new branch.
>
> As discussed, this release candidate contains a revert of HBASE-2694
> which means that it is back on the "very" old master. It is also very
> similar to what we run here in production.
>
> Sources and binaries can be found here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jdcryans/hbase-0.89.20100924-candidate-1/
>
> Documentation:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jdcryans/hbase-0.89.20100924-candidate-1/hbase-0.89.20100924/docs/
>
> Here's the list of everything I added since moving from 0830:
>
>  HBASE-3008  Memstore.updateColumnValue passes wrong flag to heapSizeChange
>  HBASE-3035  Bandaid for HBASE-2990
>  HBASE-2643  Figure how to deal with eof splitting logs
>  HBASE-2941  port HADOOP-6713 - threading scalability for RPC reads - to HBase
>  HBASE-3006  Reading compressed HFile blocks causes way too many DFS RPC calls
>             severly impacting performance
>  HBASE-2989  [replication] RSM won't cleanup after locking if 0 peers
>  HBASE-2992  [replication] MalformedObjectNameException in ReplicationMetrics
>  HBASE-3034  Revert the regions assignment part of HBASE-2694 (and
> pals) for 0.89
>  HBASE-3033  [replication] ReplicationSink.replicateEntries improvements
>  HBASE-2997  Performance fixes - profiler driven
>  HBASE-2889  Tool to look at HLogs -- parse and tail -f (patch #2 only)
>
> Unfortunately I forgot to add HBASE-2986 like Stack asked (sorry, I
> just figured it while reading the old voting thread).
>
> Should we release this as the next "Development Release"? Please cast
> your vote by Wednesday, September 29th.
>
> Thanks,
>
> The HBase Team
>

Mime
View raw message