hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan Rawson <ryano...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Heads-up: big commit in next day or so; "HBASE-2692 Master rewrite and cleanup for 0.90"
Date Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:36:02 GMT
There might not be straight line performance, but there are features
to be enabled, and also some things that are sped up, like region
assignment, don't show in many standard performance tests (eg: ycsb).

If you are serious, maybe you could help by running performance tests?
 Running performance tests is not an easy thing, and can occupy a
senior engineer an entire day running a series of tests just to
produce 1 spreadsheet.  In reality it's performance #s vs working
code.  I think you know the one we pick.


On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jonathan:
> Can you publish performance metric (compared with current trunk) from
> cluster running the new master ?
> Thanks
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Jonathan Gray <jgray@facebook.com> wrote:
>> Though I'm sure my vote is clear, I'm +1 on this.
>> The plan at fb is to update our internal branch to (almost) the current
>> head of trunk, before the commit of the master branch.  Ongoing testing will
>> continue on this branch.
>> In parallel, testing will also begin here on the new master following the
>> mega commit.
>> Hopefully we can transition everything to the new master sooner than later
>> instead of splitting time.  I'd say shortly after initial testing is
>> complete we should push for a new master 0.89 or 0.90RC and ask users to
>> test as much as possible.
>> I did as much as possible to try and get reviews along the way, including
>> several very early design discussions and group code review sessions, but
>> this is pretty radical change so has not been easy.  If you're familiar with
>> the old BaseScanner, RegionManager, ZooKeeperWrapper, etc. this stuff has
>> been cut and the replacements are much shorter/simpler.
>> Just need to find all the bugs and fill in the oversights :)
>> Stack, thanks for carrying this thing over the finish line.
>> JG
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: saint.ack@gmail.com [mailto:saint.ack@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
>> > Stack
>> > Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 12:44 AM
>> > To: HBase Dev List
>> > Subject: Heads-up: big commit in next day or so; "HBASE-2692 Master
>> > rewrite and cleanup for 0.90"
>> >
>> > I just posted the patch to https://review.cloudera.org/r/750/.  Its a
>> > little on the large size (1.5MB. Sorry about that).
>> >
>> > The bulk of the patch is by Karthik Ranganathan and Jon Gray.  They've
>> > been working on it in the 0.90_master_rewrite branch with a good few
>> > months now.  Its been reviewed pretty extensively, multiple times, but
>> > its too big for any one individual to review in anything but a cursory
>> > manner in its current form (Again, sorry about that).  Piece-mealing
>> > the changes into the code base was tried but getting all of the
>> > stepped changes in was going to take eons to complete and when we
>> > tried it, it wasn't working well anyways -- reviewers had a hard time
>> > getting their heads around partial feature implementations and
>> > groundwork baffled when the superstructure wasn't coming till a later
>> > stage.
>> >
>> > This patch addresses issues head on that have plagued us for what
>> > seems like ages now --- troublesome assignment of regions in
>> > particular -- and IMO in spite of its size and lack of review, unless
>> > objection, I'm going to go ahead and commit this patch tomorrow or the
>> > day after, after all tests pass.  We could let this monster stew out
>> > on the branch for another couple or weeks or a month but IMO, lts
>> > mature enough to be added to TRUNK so we can all work on the
>> > stabilization that will get us to 0.90.0 Release Candidate.
>> >
>> > See the umbrella issue for all thats addressed -- about 11 or 12
>> > issues in all, a few of them blockers -- but here is a synopsis of
>> > what the patch includes:
>> >
>> > + Region in transition data structure is now kept out in zookeeper to
>> > facilitate master failover and to do away with race conditions that
>> > used result in double assignment of regions
>> > + Open and close of regions as well as server shutdown handling and
>> > table transitions are now done in Executors; config. says how much
>> > parallellism to run with.  Default is 3 openers, 3 closers, with
>> > designated handlers for meta and root opening, etc. (We used to be
>> > single-threaded in master and regionserver doing opens/closes, etc.)
>> > + New load balancer; features include figuring out the plan on startup
>> > and then assigning out all regions in the one assignment.  New method
>> > in admin tool allows you unload region from one server and assign it
>> > to another explicit server.
>> > + Most of what passed over the heartbeating mechanism has now moved to
>> > go via zk or the master directly invokes rpc to close/open regions
>> > rather than wait on heartbeat to come around
>> >
>> > There is more including a bunch of cleanup and refactorings that in
>> > particular facilitate testing, and this patch lays the ground work for
>> > new features coming down the pipeline (the same executor/handler
>> > mechanism will get us parallel flushing, splitting and compacting).
>> >
>> > Things will look different after this patch goes in, there are lots of
>> > zk transitions in logs now, and this patch is going to drum up new
>> > kinds of bugs but after a week of gung-ho bug bashing we should have
>> > ourselves a more robust hbase.
>> >
>> > St.Ack

View raw message