Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 12564 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2010 03:58:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Jul 2010 03:58:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 29718 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2010 03:58:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 29514 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2010 03:58:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 29506 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2010 03:58:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29503 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2010 03:58:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 03:58:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 03:58:38 +0000 Received: by vws10 with SMTP id 10so9507310vws.35 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:57:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=AiyF8PBwAqtBQiu+xw2PxpPicWDrYJKXWsaBCcPB4VM=; b=aUrSF0afF8Tp7cyWcm+w8iaf2pv1UtNa1sscwzUzqnM1VuGxlmGvPNwKl2dRciDf3b YpX4J9JD3yAyIeuLjwticj7iVxEQlMCf+kd47/tayl4yt1+fjClbdL0C4fj6wLglyJP6 35b9A5VFuVd8Y4GOcONn926cUABPfeVdOE1ss= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=ASsYa7Epr8mv6NUd3NkGiMyJEiae32Ui+EGmxD8wsclNctdw5nxSysFryA22RQHF79 QqihGZvT6vsJI7GlVDA5H+/D/P48PoXvCCLqErMNKS0YAckbjYoEf3GqI7cRByxycTzf uFSxNQYTq65A8vWi2H/BnnM8kEWZuJ2z9Z2Tc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.183.84 with SMTP id cf20mr9981305qcb.75.1279079837071; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:57:17 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.26.11 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:57:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:57:16 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: mTQv7GzIF25igyVNyHreVEO2qfs Message-ID: Subject: OK if we roll a 0.20.6 candidate and next iteration on 0.89.x by friday? From: Stack To: HBase Dev List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Any objections? Anything that needs to be added to either before we cut release candidates? 0.20 branch has a few NPE fixes and an RPC leak healed. TRUNK, from where we'll cut the next 0.89 has had a good few fixes since 0.89.20100621. Replication has also been committed. St.Ack