Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jgray@facebook.com designates
 69.63.179.25 as permitted sender)
From: Jonathan Gray <jgray@facebook.com>
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.6 Release Candidate 1 as
 	hbase-0.20.6?
Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.6 Release Candidate 1 as
 	hbase-0.20.6?
Thread-Index: AQHLJ8JjPz8m/DwbrUmkaXUk/n5smpK8A/sAgAWQzQCAAJzKAP//ktXA
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 15:01:05 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <5A76F6CE309AD049AAF9A039A392428207217D4D@sc-mbx04.TheFacebook.com>
References: <AANLkTil1RB9M8hvPj3Qg8mH5UJbdL8hxaV6kYyXSM8-V@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTilWdn49Azm3TSTGg4SoUlnECHAWp6J5TLjSQDgg@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTik_rhYti_8kfLoGKHf6G3xddjBynfyfXcLUj6Tq@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTim+5hzoNR0L51x-Zmfx2UAMWOJDJ19m20Uv8a4o@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim+5hzoNR0L51x-Zmfx2UAMWOJDJ19m20Uv8a4o@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

HBASE-2473 is a new feature.  0.21 is equivalent to 0.89 and 0.90 (trunk). =
 0.89 are dev releases off trunk which will be release as 0.90.

0.20 branch is an old branch that will not have new features added to it, j=
ust bug fixes.  All new features should be done against trunk only.

http://hbaseblog.com/2010/07/04/hug11-hbase-0-90-preview-wrap-up/

There's more info about the versions in the deck on that blog post.

JG

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Yu [mailto:yuzhihong@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 7:30 AM
> To: dev@hbase.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.6 Release Candidate 1
> as hbase-0.20.6?
>=20
> Since HBASE-2473 is marked fixed for 0.21, some advice regarding the
> roadmap
> for 0.21 vs. 0.20.6 vs 0.89 would help us decide which version to use.
>=20
> Thanks
>=20
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> > I don't see HBASE-2473 among the 8 fixes of 0.20.6
> > I checked 0.20.5 source code and didn't seem to find the patch there
> > either.
> >
> > Please advise.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Dave Latham <latham@davelink.net>
> wrote:
> >
> >> For what it's worth, I've been running the 0.20 branch at r963948,
> which
> >> is
> >> the same as this release candidate except for
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2837.  Haven't had any
> >> problems.
> >>
> >> Dave
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I've posted an hbase 0.20.6 release candidate 5 here:
> >> >
> >> >  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.6-candidate-
> 1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Estack/hbase-0.20.6-candidate-1/>
> >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Estack/hbase-0.20.6-candidate-1/>
> >> >
> >> > There have been 8 fixes since the release of hbase-0.20.5 [1].
> >> >
> >> > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.6?
> >> >
> >> > Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance.  Vote closes
> >> > Monday July 26th.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Your HBase Team
> >> >
> >> > 1. http://su.pr/1kRdZN
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >