hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.6 Release Candidate 1 as hbase-0.20.6?
Date Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:56:06 GMT
Jonathan:
Is HBASE-2473 related to new load balancer in Master rewrite branch ?
Can you elaborate on the relationship between Master rewrite branch and 0.90
release ?

Thanks

On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Jonathan Gray <jgray@facebook.com> wrote:

> HBASE-2473 is a new feature.  0.21 is equivalent to 0.89 and 0.90 (trunk).
>  0.89 are dev releases off trunk which will be release as 0.90.
>
> 0.20 branch is an old branch that will not have new features added to it,
> just bug fixes.  All new features should be done against trunk only.
>
> http://hbaseblog.com/2010/07/04/hug11-hbase-0-90-preview-wrap-up/
>
> There's more info about the versions in the deck on that blog post.
>
> JG
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ted Yu [mailto:yuzhihong@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 7:30 AM
> > To: dev@hbase.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.6 Release Candidate 1
> > as hbase-0.20.6?
> >
> > Since HBASE-2473 is marked fixed for 0.21, some advice regarding the
> > roadmap
> > for 0.21 vs. 0.20.6 vs 0.89 would help us decide which version to use.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I don't see HBASE-2473 among the 8 fixes of 0.20.6
> > > I checked 0.20.5 source code and didn't seem to find the patch there
> > > either.
> > >
> > > Please advise.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Dave Latham <latham@davelink.net>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> For what it's worth, I've been running the 0.20 branch at r963948,
> > which
> > >> is
> > >> the same as this release candidate except for
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2837.  Haven't had any
> > >> problems.
> > >>
> > >> Dave
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I've posted an hbase 0.20.6 release candidate 5 here:
> > >> >
> > >> >  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.6-candidate-<http://people.apache.org/%7Estack/hbase-0.20.6-candidate->
> > 1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Estack/hbase-0.20.6-candidate-1/>
> > >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Estack/hbase-0.20.6-candidate-1/>
> > >> >
> > >> > There have been 8 fixes since the release of hbase-0.20.5 [1].
> > >> >
> > >> > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.6?
> > >> >
> > >> > Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance.  Vote closes
> > >> > Monday July 26th.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Your HBase Team
> > >> >
> > >> > 1. http://su.pr/1kRdZN
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message