Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18268 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2010 05:19:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Jun 2010 05:19:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 6632 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2010 05:19:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 6328 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2010 05:19:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 6313 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2010 05:19:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 05:19:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.41] (HELO mail-vw0-f41.google.com) (209.85.212.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 05:18:59 +0000 Received: by vws8 with SMTP id 8so1722509vws.14 for ; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 22:18:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uEZMjKkaDu7Hsa6B4jWWsI98rPp0SvJiS8HUywTasbs=; b=ngwK7z+NMXyf28z0hNDpeg0DEd2y/mId+xB/u/cfS+hkA+Dj04WSC47J0ZQUPYzstQ ajIXwtMv+A4fnQF+GgOrS8ZLQu3xPqe3hIuj3SSdb/CdmPqehSE4KW2psJkyDVYAUjW2 mHRb5zjE5hqLGp7wpCBNNUseZpzoHT37kW+3k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=j9J86YQYp1C1PNTDls7z+9Icmzo0Sv6C9VVaL6V6FCep/1Z52j8fyVBYLrfv0LAUo3 jCqbHj29OI/eb3NG4vcU9bNlYM11s3tuuaGCEb314kv6ptvDJmLdYBSZUTMxvt9oB+lg ap6ySUcAE3ve/szDPniSF1P0Yf85ikAc19n0g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.70.129 with SMTP id d1mr3075639qaj.357.1276147117865; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 22:18:37 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.214.68 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 22:18:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 22:18:37 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: nO8ce_j1_J9TGGNTbFyHkbpn6FU Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.5 Release Candidate 2 as hbase-0.20.5? From: Stack To: dev@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wr= ote: > I'm currently testing the release on a cluster, but right off the bat > I see that the tar contains unwanted files. See the first two ones > here http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.5-candidate-2/hbase-0.20.= 5/ > Thats bad on my part. I'd say keep on testing this candidate and if passes muster, when I role the release, I'll excise the two patch files. St.Ack > J-D > > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Stack wrote: >> I've posted an hbase 0.20.5 release candidate 2 here: >> >> =A0http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.5-candidate-2/ >> >> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.5? >> >> It has 18 fixes: http://su.pr/1prW9y >> >> Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. =A0Vote closes >> Friday, the 11th of June. >> >> Yours, >> Your HBase Homies >> >