hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcry...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.5 Release Candidate 2 as hbase-0.20.5?
Date Wed, 09 Jun 2010 20:32:53 GMT
I agree with Ryan, and what we actually need would be a Known Issues
document shipped with all releases. For 0.20, lack of sync should be
the top item.

J-D

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Ryan Rawson <ryanobjc@gmail.com> wrote:
> Every release we ship has bugs, some known, most unknown.  I have
> previously argued against perfectionism in our releases (perfect is
> the enemy of good), since if a bug isn't so bad and is in a previous
> release, then maybe we shouldn't hold up a release which has lots of
> other important fixes.  The focus is on keeping forward momentum and
> preventing regressions.  I think people might generally appreciate
> more but smaller releases with fewer fixes (eg: 0.20.5 has about 18
> fixes which seems pretty good, not too high not too low).
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:
>> This is a slippery slope.
>>
>> --- On Tue, 6/8/10, Todd Lipcon <todd@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Todd Lipcon <todd@cloudera.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.5 Release Candidate 2 as  hbase-0.20.5?
>>> To: dev@hbase.apache.org
>>> Date: Tuesday, June 8, 2010, 7:26 PM
>>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Ryan
>>> Rawson <ryanobjc@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Should we ship 0.20.5 with the fixes as is?  The
>>> bug is very rare, and
>>> > while some people might come across it, it is in
>>> 0.20.4 which is known
>>> > to be bad.
>>> >
>>> > We need to get a better 0.20 out there than
>>> 0.20.4.  What we have is
>>> > pretty good, and we can fix the next issue in 0.20.6.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> Actually that sounds fair to me. Ignore my -1 conditional
>>> on us doing an
>>> 0.20.6 sometime in the next couple weeks.
>>>
>>> I'll try to do some cluster testing this week to actually
>>> put a +1 in
>>> instead of just retracting a -1 :)
>>>
>>> -Todd
>>>
>>>
>>> > -ryan
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Todd Lipcon <todd@cloudera.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > Unfortunately -1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2670affects
>>> > > branch as well.
>>> > >
>>> > > I'm working on a fix, will target both branch and
>>> trunk, but may be a
>>> > couple
>>> > > days before we can thoroughly test it (this bug
>>> is devious)
>>> > >
>>> > > -Todd
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> I've posted an hbase 0.20.5 release candidate
>>> 2 here:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.5-candidate-2/
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Should we release this candidate as hbase
>>> 0.20.5?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> It has 18 fixes: http://su.pr/1prW9y
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Please take it for a test spin if you have a
>>> chance.  Vote closes
>>> > >> Friday, the 11th of June.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Yours,
>>> > >> Your HBase Homies
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Todd Lipcon
>>> > > Software Engineer, Cloudera
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Todd Lipcon
>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message