hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.5 Release Candidate 2 as hbase-0.20.5?
Date Wed, 09 Jun 2010 21:13:40 GMT
+1 on 0.20.5RC 2

> From: Ryan Rawson <ryanobjc@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.5 Release Candidate 2 as  hbase-0.20.5?
> To: dev@hbase.apache.org
> Date: Wednesday, June 9, 2010, 1:07 PM
> Every release we ship has bugs, some
> known, most unknown.  I have
> previously argued against perfectionism in our releases
> (perfect is
> the enemy of good), since if a bug isn't so bad and is in a
> previous
> release, then maybe we shouldn't hold up a release which
> has lots of
> other important fixes.  The focus is on keeping
> forward momentum and
> preventing regressions.  I think people might
> generally appreciate
> more but smaller releases with fewer fixes (eg: 0.20.5 has
> about 18
> fixes which seems pretty good, not too high not too low).
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > This is a slippery slope.
> >
> > --- On Tue, 6/8/10, Todd Lipcon <todd@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Todd Lipcon <todd@cloudera.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.5
> Release Candidate 2 as  hbase-0.20.5?
> >> To: dev@hbase.apache.org
> >> Date: Tuesday, June 8, 2010, 7:26 PM
> >> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Ryan
> >> Rawson <ryanobjc@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Should we ship 0.20.5 with the fixes as is? 
> The
> >> bug is very rare, and
> >> > while some people might come across it, it is
> in
> >> 0.20.4 which is known
> >> > to be bad.
> >> >
> >> > We need to get a better 0.20 out there than
> >> 0.20.4.  What we have is
> >> > pretty good, and we can fix the next issue in
> 0.20.6.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Actually that sounds fair to me. Ignore my -1
> conditional
> >> on us doing an
> >> 0.20.6 sometime in the next couple weeks.
> >>
> >> I'll try to do some cluster testing this week to
> actually
> >> put a +1 in
> >> instead of just retracting a -1 :)
> >>
> >> -Todd
> >>
> >>
> >> > -ryan
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Todd Lipcon
> <todd@cloudera.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > Unfortunately -1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2670affects
> >> > > branch as well.
> >> > >
> >> > > I'm working on a fix, will target both
> branch and
> >> trunk, but may be a
> >> > couple
> >> > > days before we can thoroughly test it
> (this bug
> >> is devious)
> >> > >
> >> > > -Todd
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Stack
> <stack@duboce.net>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> I've posted an hbase 0.20.5 release
> candidate
> >> 2 here:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.5-candidate-2/
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Should we release this candidate as
> hbase
> >> 0.20.5?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> It has 18 fixes: http://su.pr/1prW9y
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Please take it for a test spin if
> you have a
> >> chance.  Vote closes
> >> > >> Friday, the 11th of June.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Yours,
> >> > >> Your HBase Homies
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Todd Lipcon
> >> > > Software Engineer, Cloudera
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Todd Lipcon
> >> Software Engineer, Cloudera
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 


      


Mime
View raw message