Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36176 invoked from network); 25 May 2010 18:57:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 May 2010 18:57:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 51670 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 18:57:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 51527 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 18:57:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 51519 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 18:57:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51516 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2010 18:57:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 18:57:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jdcryans@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.172] (HELO mail-qy0-f172.google.com) (209.85.221.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 18:57:48 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so1165785qyk.20 for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 11:57:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EREAzMMVOXlBbl1W7yLx0m/6ZUv7Yoy4qIcf7EJ661k=; b=HrH7B79QsC8gOK44C3gYfF3vSx6SKlZ2bf0UMqBxj7K5QMMFAW/3EPNPYvCVfpO2p5 KZktTfr+C23p11d0LV47qzd1GjC2t3f7WqIypKnlhSjlMHQsqIhu2g/uz8/BP8ttx+RQ pGJcQf83HhgnDESldq2N9Nf6Q/bbqsPIySP9s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=lLzOt90ISQNVsjD8llgJ3MbnNCg6SDQovOsAfSCmlGuzA+x3j3oUKOKLvFbmGeR2k8 R/HZWn/4LbXHHi7/+gse4hksE3GfE8TmE5BgEwt/2oiSlMQhUljZ80ZgJW0laCV+wdH5 ihEJ5k/kg9tuEWCAjo3avfmIGsp4qLdxxXhPQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.62.210 with SMTP id y18mr681705qah.149.1274813847663; Tue, 25 May 2010 11:57:27 -0700 (PDT) Sender: jdcryans@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.240.9 with HTTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 11:57:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 11:57:27 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ERWjyblt8gVSrEOfgcORmkYILI8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.5 Release Candidate 1 as hbase-0.20.5? From: Jean-Daniel Cryans To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org -1, I think we need at least HBASE-2606 (which was already committed to branch anyways). J-D On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Stack wrote: > I've posted an hbase 0.20.5 release candidate 1 here: > > =A0http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.5-candidate-1/ > > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.5? > > It has four bug fixes and it adds a few missing header licenses (See > CHANGES.txt or the release notes in the docs [1] for issues addressed > by this candidate). > > Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. =A0Vote closes > Thursday, the 20th of May. > > Yours, > Your HBase Team > > 1. http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.5-candidate-1/hbase-0.20.5/= docs/releasenotes.html >