hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jonathan Gray <jg...@facebook.com>
Subject RE: JIRAs committed on trunk but not branch (take 2)
Date Wed, 12 May 2010 17:48:51 GMT
Hmm I don't recall claiming we'd need o.a.h.h.client.  And don't agree that we do.  Was it
someone else who said that?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Purtell [mailto:apurtell@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 10:25 AM
> To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: RE: JIRAs committed on trunk but not branch (take 2)
> 
> Hey Jon,
> 
> You claimed on on IRC, we'll need o.a.h.h.client for the next major
> release. So you have revised that opinion? Maybe I'm just confused?
> 
> > From: Jonathan Gray
> > Subject: RE: JIRAs committed on trunk but not branch (take 2)
> >
> > What are peoples thoughts on moving to o.a.h?
> > Personally this looks like a good opportunity to do it as
> > we're all going to need to rebase existing work onto trunk
> > anyways, we're breaking compatibility across the board,
> > etc.  It would be nice not to have to break
> > compatibility for the release that follows our next one.
> 
> 
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message