hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stack <st...@duboce.net>
Subject [VOTE] HBase as an Apache top-level project? Re: [DISCUSS] HBase as Apache top-level project?
Date Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:04:28 GMT
Do we want to become an Apache top-level project?

Please vote.

(I'm +1)

Thanks,
St.Ack

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> I'd like to start a discussion about promoting HBase from a Hadoop
> sub-project to a top-level Apache project (TLP).
>
> This is not yet a vote.  Once we have established general
> understanding and agreement, I'll call a vote.
>
> I propose we move HBase from hadoop.apache.org/hbase to
> hbase.apache.org.  HBase would then have it's own Project Management
> Committee (PMC) so that it can elect committers and create releases on
> its own.  Currently these actions require votes by the Hadoop PMC.
> However I think HBase now has a sufficiently large, diverse and
> distinct community that it can fend for itself.
>
> I suggest that initial HBase PMC consist of all active HBase
> committers at the time we make the formal proposal.  This is typical
> for new TLPs. (Subsequently PMCs tend to promote committers to the
> PMC.  The Hadoop PMC generally promotes committers to the PMC after a
> year of consistent activity, while some projects immediately add new
> committers to their PMC.  But we don't need to decide our policy for
> new PMC membership now, only the makeup of the initial PMC.)
>
> I nominate myself as the initial chair of the HBase PMC, with the
> proviso that we adopt a policy of regular chair replacement.  I
> suggest that HBase PMC chairs serve a one or two-year term.  A PMC
> chair has no more power than other PMC members, but rather has a few
> more duties.  In particular, the chair must submit written quarterly
> reports to the board describing the health of the projects developer
> community.  The chair also maintains subversion permissions and
> committer account creation.
>
> Do these proposal sound reasonable?  Any improvements or questions?
>
> For some background, please read:
>
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#roles
>
> The steps I imagine are roughly:
>  - discussion by HBase developers (what I'm starting here today)
>  - vote by HBase developers
>  - discussion by Hadoop PMC
>  - vote by Hadoop PMC
>  - draft resolution sent to board
>  - board votes on resolution to form TLP
>
> Formally, the board alone has the power to create a TLP: all prior
> steps are merely an ordered means to make the case to the board that
> all involved parties support such an action.
>
> Thanks,
>
> St.Ack
>
> (Above is a message Doug Cutting sent to the Avro dev list after doing
> a s/Avro/HBase/)
>

Mime
View raw message