hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From psm...@aconex.com
Subject Re: Maven assembly speed issue (from discussion with jdcryans on IRC)
Date Sun, 14 Mar 2010 06:34:31 GMT
Yep i would downgrade to beta-1 in the pluginmanagement section it's  
way faster.



On 14/03/2010, at 14:35, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> I did this bit of the patch:
>
>
> @@ -308,10 +309,6 @@
>         <descriptors>
>           <descriptor>src/assembly/bin.xml</descriptor>
>         </descriptors>
> -          <descriptorRefs>
> -            <descriptorRef>src</descriptorRef>
> -            <descriptorRef>project</descriptorRef>
> -          </descriptorRefs>
>       </configuration>
>     </plugin>
>   </plugins>
>
>
> ... but as Lars says, there is a version up in the pluginManagement
> section.  Should I downgrade from beta5 to beta1?
>
> Thanks lads,
> St>Ack
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Lars Francke  
> <lars.francke@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Because the current pom doesn't specify a plugin version, it's  
>>> using the latest version.
>>
>> The pluginManagement section actually does specify a plugin version:
>> 2.2-beta-5. But if that does cause problems - and the ticket you
>> linked to proves that feel free to downgrade but I would appreciate  
>> it
>> if you did it in the pluginManagement section. I don't have access to
>> the source code right now so I can't provide an updated patch.
>>
>> I'm swamped right now but I plan to continue working on the Maven
>> build as well once everything has settled down. Thanks for keeping up
>> the good work on this Paul!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Lars
>>
> Return-Path: hbase-dev-return-18272- 
> psmith=aconex.com@hadoop.apache.org
> Received: from gatekeeper.aconex.com (LHLO gatekeeper.aconex.com)
> (192.168.102.10) by mail-au.aconex.com with LMTP; Sun, 14 Mar 2010  
> 14:35:27
> +1100 (EST)
> Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
>    by gatekeeper.aconex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECCE4884AB
>    for <psmith@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:27 +1100 (EST)
> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at aconex.com
> Received: from gatekeeper.aconex.com ([127.0.0.1])
>    by localhost (gatekeeper.aconex.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,  
> port 10024)
>    with ESMTP id km2MgDbjPJTS for <psmith@aconex.com>;
>    Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:23 +1100 (EST)
> Received: from postoffice2.aconex.com (cuda.yarra.acx [192.168.102.2])
>    by gatekeeper.aconex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC0B4884A0
>    for <psmith@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:23 +1100 (EST)
> X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1268537722-21ea001d0000-Y2sTMG
> X-Barracuda-URL: http://postoffice2.aconex.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi
> Received: from postoffice.aconex.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>    by postoffice2.aconex.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id  
> A54D865A545
>    for <psmith@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:22 +1100 (EST)
> Received: from postoffice.aconex.com (postoffice.yarra.acx  
> [192.168.102.1]) by postoffice2.aconex.com with ESMTP id  
> rYMmYXVfAMBHWHz8 for <psmith@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:22  
> +1100 (EST)
> X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: hbase-dev-return-18272-psmith=aconex.com@hadoop.apache.org
> Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
>    by postoffice.aconex.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B0B5BA50280
>    for <psmith@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:32:37 +1100 (EST)
> Received: (qmail 28038 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2010 03:35:20 -0000
> Mailing-List: contact hbase-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
> Precedence: bulk
> List-Help: <mailto:hbase-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org>
> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:hbase-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org>
> List-Post: <mailto:hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org>
> List-Id: <hbase-dev.hadoop.apache.org>
> Reply-To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Delivered-To: mailing list hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Received: (qmail 28030 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2010 03:35:20 -0000
> Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136 
> )
>    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Mar 2010  
> 03:35:20 +0000
> X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
>     
> tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
> X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
> Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com  
> designates 209.85.217.225 as permitted sender)
> Received: from [209.85.217.225] (HELO mail-gx0-f225.google.com) (209.85.217.225 
> )
>    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Mar 2010  
> 03:35:19 +0000
> Received: by gxk25 with SMTP id 25so1054366gxk.11
>        for <hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org>; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:34:58  
> -0800 (PST)
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
>        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
>         :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message- 
> id:subject:from:to
>         :content-type;
>        bh=2XJuE3DRSu1PZi6mitn5hB/CWqgf8oZZg8Cq7kmSssE=;
>         
> b=RZFvxOjcosPp1kKzR3S2IRyF3s6U3RShvv32DKopAtC3RpA7y1jvGLXadoM96FJI0Z
>          
> YOxb2Yowwa4zIHn4mz3A8aj8TxvnefJ6Obu6uTWhOan1qgSI2KSIZQjKbQN9QyDsVSo0
>         Z5lgnd67OEHNbQIGwY2x2amNg9t13BtblmtlY=
> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
>        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
>        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
>         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
>        b=ohJ64CZsLYoxZXEC223B1Yjf039FwFNukpuGNPm7MSIp+GGT 
> +SteBG2+DdAaTCQ7L7
>         VKVtv6tsSxIZCQjjhPmklrA1agRZY6ebfHgD5os7Ob2lZ/ 
> AsSJyQwOlCZYgoRLm0L4nB
>         ym72VyxsSZZedzkdFKkccGaQcf6544depe/Ug=
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com
> Received: by 10.101.42.12 with SMTP id u12mr332581anj. 
> 56.1268537698290; Sat,
>    13 Mar 2010 19:34:58 -0800 (PST)
> In-Reply-To: <fda1bfdd1003121936x6362dea5k3f37c2d4f17a9ed3@mail.gmail.com 
> >
> References: <79B274BD-CB9A-4B81-B224-C0A7F85864EF@aconex.com>
>     <fda1bfdd1003121936x6362dea5k3f37c2d4f17a9ed3@mail.gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:34:58 -0800
> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2cf34d151e284d55
> Message-ID: <7c962aed1003131934h7b03a75cs85ffbb164ff487fd@mail.gmail.com 
> >
> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: Maven assembly speed issue (from discussion  
> with jdcryans on IRC)
> Subject: Re: Maven assembly speed issue (from discussion with  
> jdcryans on IRC)
> From: Stack <stack@duboce.net>
> To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> X-Barracuda-Connect: postoffice.yarra.acx[192.168.102.1]
> X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1268537722
> X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210
> X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Aconex Staff Email Spam Firewall at aconex.com
> X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02
> X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using global scores of  
> TAG_LEVEL=3.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=5.0 KILL_LEVEL=6.0 tests=
> X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.24799
>    Rule breakdown below
>     pts rule name              description
>    ---- ----------------------  
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> I did this bit of the patch:
>
>
> @@ -308,10 +309,6 @@
>         <descriptors>
>           <descriptor>src/assembly/bin.xml</descriptor>
>         </descriptors>
> -          <descriptorRefs>
> -            <descriptorRef>src</descriptorRef>
> -            <descriptorRef>project</descriptorRef>
> -          </descriptorRefs>
>       </configuration>
>     </plugin>
>   </plugins>
>
>
> ... but as Lars says, there is a version up in the pluginManagement
> section.  Should I downgrade from beta5 to beta1?
>
> Thanks lads,
> St>Ack
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Lars Francke  
> <lars.francke@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Because the current pom doesn't specify a plugin version, it's  
>>> using the latest version.
>>
>> The pluginManagement section actually does specify a plugin version:
>> 2.2-beta-5. But if that does cause problems - and the ticket you
>> linked to proves that feel free to downgrade but I would appreciate  
>> it
>> if you did it in the pluginManagement section. I don't have access to
>> the source code right now so I can't provide an updated patch.
>>
>> I'm swamped right now but I plan to continue working on the Maven
>> build as well once everything has settled down. Thanks for keeping up
>> the good work on this Paul!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Lars
>>

Mime
View raw message