hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stack <st...@duboce.net>
Subject Re: Maven assembly speed issue (from discussion with jdcryans on IRC)
Date Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:20:10 GMT
I committed the change.  Its much faster.  Thanks lads.
St.Ack

On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:34 PM,  <psmith@aconex.com> wrote:
> Yep i would downgrade to beta-1 in the pluginmanagement section it's way
> faster.
>
>
>
> On 14/03/2010, at 14:35, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> I did this bit of the patch:
>>
>>
>> @@ -308,10 +309,6 @@
>>        <descriptors>
>>          <descriptor>src/assembly/bin.xml</descriptor>
>>        </descriptors>
>> -          <descriptorRefs>
>> -            <descriptorRef>src</descriptorRef>
>> -            <descriptorRef>project</descriptorRef>
>> -          </descriptorRefs>
>>      </configuration>
>>    </plugin>
>>  </plugins>
>>
>>
>> ... but as Lars says, there is a version up in the pluginManagement
>> section.  Should I downgrade from beta5 to beta1?
>>
>> Thanks lads,
>> St>Ack
>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Lars Francke <lars.francke@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Because the current pom doesn't specify a plugin version, it's using the
>>>> latest version.
>>>
>>> The pluginManagement section actually does specify a plugin version:
>>> 2.2-beta-5. But if that does cause problems - and the ticket you
>>> linked to proves that feel free to downgrade but I would appreciate it
>>> if you did it in the pluginManagement section. I don't have access to
>>> the source code right now so I can't provide an updated patch.
>>>
>>> I'm swamped right now but I plan to continue working on the Maven
>>> build as well once everything has settled down. Thanks for keeping up
>>> the good work on this Paul!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Lars
>>>
>> Return-Path: hbase-dev-return-18272-psmith=aconex.com@hadoop.apache.org
>> Received: from gatekeeper.aconex.com (LHLO gatekeeper.aconex.com)
>> (192.168.102.10) by mail-au.aconex.com with LMTP; Sun, 14 Mar 2010
>> 14:35:27
>> +1100 (EST)
>> Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
>>   by gatekeeper.aconex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECCE4884AB
>>   for <psmith@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:27 +1100 (EST)
>> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at aconex.com
>> Received: from gatekeeper.aconex.com ([127.0.0.1])
>>   by localhost (gatekeeper.aconex.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port
>> 10024)
>>   with ESMTP id km2MgDbjPJTS for <psmith@aconex.com>;
>>   Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:23 +1100 (EST)
>> Received: from postoffice2.aconex.com (cuda.yarra.acx [192.168.102.2])
>>   by gatekeeper.aconex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC0B4884A0
>>   for <psmith@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:23 +1100 (EST)
>> X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1268537722-21ea001d0000-Y2sTMG
>> X-Barracuda-URL: http://postoffice2.aconex.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi
>> Received: from postoffice.aconex.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>>   by postoffice2.aconex.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id
>> A54D865A545
>>   for <psmith@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:22 +1100 (EST)
>> Received: from postoffice.aconex.com (postoffice.yarra.acx
>> [192.168.102.1]) by postoffice2.aconex.com with ESMTP id rYMmYXVfAMBHWHz8
>> for <psmith@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:22 +1100 (EST)
>> X-Barracuda-Envelope-From:
>> hbase-dev-return-18272-psmith=aconex.com@hadoop.apache.org
>> Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
>>   by postoffice.aconex.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B0B5BA50280
>>   for <psmith@aconex.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:32:37 +1100 (EST)
>> Received: (qmail 28038 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2010 03:35:20 -0000
>> Mailing-List: contact hbase-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
>> Precedence: bulk
>> List-Help: <mailto:hbase-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org>
>> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:hbase-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org>
>> List-Post: <mailto:hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org>
>> List-Id: <hbase-dev.hadoop.apache.org>
>> Reply-To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
>> Delivered-To: mailing list hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
>> Received: (qmail 28030 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2010 03:35:20 -0000
>> Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
>>   by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:35:20 +0000
>> X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
>>   tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
>> X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
>> Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com
>> designates 209.85.217.225 as permitted sender)
>> Received: from [209.85.217.225] (HELO mail-gx0-f225.google.com)
>> (209.85.217.225)
>>   by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:35:19 +0000
>> Received: by gxk25 with SMTP id 25so1054366gxk.11
>>       for <hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org>; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:34:58 -0800
>> (PST)
>> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>>       d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
>>       h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
>>        :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to
>>        :content-type;
>>       bh=2XJuE3DRSu1PZi6mitn5hB/CWqgf8oZZg8Cq7kmSssE=;
>>       b=RZFvxOjcosPp1kKzR3S2IRyF3s6U3RShvv32DKopAtC3RpA7y1jvGLXadoM96FJI0Z
>>
>>  YOxb2Yowwa4zIHn4mz3A8aj8TxvnefJ6Obu6uTWhOan1qgSI2KSIZQjKbQN9QyDsVSo0
>>        Z5lgnd67OEHNbQIGwY2x2amNg9t13BtblmtlY=
>> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
>>       d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
>>       h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
>>        :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
>>       b=ohJ64CZsLYoxZXEC223B1Yjf039FwFNukpuGNPm7MSIp+GGT+SteBG2+DdAaTCQ7L7
>>
>>  VKVtv6tsSxIZCQjjhPmklrA1agRZY6ebfHgD5os7Ob2lZ/AsSJyQwOlCZYgoRLm0L4nB
>>        ym72VyxsSZZedzkdFKkccGaQcf6544depe/Ug=
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com
>> Received: by 10.101.42.12 with SMTP id u12mr332581anj.56.1268537698290;
>> Sat,
>>   13 Mar 2010 19:34:58 -0800 (PST)
>> In-Reply-To: <fda1bfdd1003121936x6362dea5k3f37c2d4f17a9ed3@mail.gmail.com>
>> References: <79B274BD-CB9A-4B81-B224-C0A7F85864EF@aconex.com>
>>    <fda1bfdd1003121936x6362dea5k3f37c2d4f17a9ed3@mail.gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:34:58 -0800
>> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2cf34d151e284d55
>> Message-ID: <7c962aed1003131934h7b03a75cs85ffbb164ff487fd@mail.gmail.com>
>> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: Maven assembly speed issue (from discussion with
>> jdcryans on IRC)
>> Subject: Re: Maven assembly speed issue (from discussion with jdcryans on
>> IRC)
>> From: Stack <stack@duboce.net>
>> To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>> X-Barracuda-Connect: postoffice.yarra.acx[192.168.102.1]
>> X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1268537722
>> X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210
>> X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Aconex Staff Email Spam Firewall at
>> aconex.com
>> X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02
>> X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using global scores of
>> TAG_LEVEL=3.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=5.0 KILL_LEVEL=6.0 tests=
>> X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.24799
>>   Rule breakdown below
>>    pts rule name              description
>>   ---- ----------------------
>> --------------------------------------------------
>>
>> I did this bit of the patch:
>>
>>
>> @@ -308,10 +309,6 @@
>>        <descriptors>
>>          <descriptor>src/assembly/bin.xml</descriptor>
>>        </descriptors>
>> -          <descriptorRefs>
>> -            <descriptorRef>src</descriptorRef>
>> -            <descriptorRef>project</descriptorRef>
>> -          </descriptorRefs>
>>      </configuration>
>>    </plugin>
>>  </plugins>
>>
>>
>> ... but as Lars says, there is a version up in the pluginManagement
>> section.  Should I downgrade from beta5 to beta1?
>>
>> Thanks lads,
>> St>Ack
>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Lars Francke <lars.francke@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Because the current pom doesn't specify a plugin version, it's using the
>>>> latest version.
>>>
>>> The pluginManagement section actually does specify a plugin version:
>>> 2.2-beta-5. But if that does cause problems - and the ticket you
>>> linked to proves that feel free to downgrade but I would appreciate it
>>> if you did it in the pluginManagement section. I don't have access to
>>> the source code right now so I can't provide an updated patch.
>>>
>>> I'm swamped right now but I plan to continue working on the Maven
>>> build as well once everything has settled down. Thanks for keeping up
>>> the good work on this Paul!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Lars
>>>
>

Mime
View raw message