hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dave Latham (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HBASE-2248) New MemStoreScanner copies memstore for each scan, makes short scans slow
Date Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:22:27 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837326#action_12837326
] 

Dave Latham commented on HBASE-2248:
------------------------------------

Thanks, Dan, and others for looking into this issue.  The table where we were seeing these
slow scans was definitely a tall, narrow table.  Each row has one cell, the column family
and qualifier are each one byte.  The row varies, but is typically 8-20 bytes, and the value
is usually 4 bytes or less.  Most common is probably row - 12 bytes, col fam - 1 byte, qualifier
1 byte, value - 3 bytes, giving 17 bytes plus overhead.

As I was trying to understand the discrepancy between the PE results you mentioned and what
I've observed, I looked in to PerformanceEvaluation.  It looks like the timer only starts
after the scanner is constructed which means that the MemStore clone isn't being timed as
part of the test, so that would probably explain why the test seems fast.  Just reasoning,
it seems hard to believe that ConcurrentSkipListMap.buildFromSorted could complete a million
iterations that fast.

> New MemStoreScanner copies memstore for each scan, makes short scans slow
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-2248
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2248
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.20.3
>            Reporter: Dave Latham
>             Fix For: 0.20.4
>
>         Attachments: threads.txt
>
>
> HBASE-2037 introduced a new MemStoreScanner which triggers a ConcurrentSkipListMap.buildFromSorted
clone of the memstore and snapshot when starting a scan.
> After upgrading to 0.20.3, we noticed a big slowdown in our use of short scans.  Some
of our data repesent a time series.   The data is stored in time series order, MR jobs often
insert/update new data at the end of the series, and queries usually have to pick up some
or all of the series.  These are often scans of 0-100 rows at a time.  To load one page, we'll
observe about 20 such scans being triggered concurrently, and they take 2 seconds to complete.
 Doing a thread dump of a region server shows many threads in ConcurrentSkipListMap.biuldFromSorted
which traverses the entire map of key values to copy it.  

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message