hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "stack (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HBASE-2099) Move build to Maven
Date Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:41:28 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12830575#action_12830575
] 

stack commented on HBASE-2099:
------------------------------

@ Kay Kay, regards the below comment over in the infrastructure issue -- since closed and
I'm not sure what it means when its been closed -- on group and artifactid....

"Stack -
  Would it be useful to have the groupId as -    org.apache.hadoop.hbase   and then publish
artifacts as hbase-core / hbase-client  etc.  Let me know your thoughts on the same."

... you think the above better than my suggestion of groupid org.apache.hadoop and our artifactid
of hbase?

I suppose we'll want to publish other than hbase.jar up to maven.  There will be hbase-stargate.war
and hbase-transacation.jar etc.  hbase.jar should become hbase-core then as you suggest (and
as Paul had it originally up in the pom above before I asked him to change it).

What are the pros/cons you see to using groupid of o.a.h.h rather than o.a.h?

Related, its a good ways of I think but there is talk of a few of the hadoop projects moving
up to be top-level apache projects.  HBase is probably a good candidate so our default package
would become o.a.hbase at some stage in the future.  This would seem to argue in favor of
your suggestion for a groupid of o.a.h.h Kay Kay?

> Move build to Maven
> -------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-2099
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2099
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: stack
>         Attachments: findbugs.html, findbugs.html, HBase Move Script.txt, HBASE-2099.9.patch,
test-reports.zip
>
>
> This issue is for discussing pros and cons of moving hbase build to Apache Maven.
> Maven, if you take on its paradigm, does a lot for you.  There are also a bunch of nice
plugins that do nice reports on state of project; findbugs, that nice plugin where you can
give out urls that will resolve to lines in source code (a doxygen-like thing ... I've forgotten
its name).  Other examples are a docbook plugin that would do the build inline with doc build.
 We could start up the hbase book using docbook format and the hbase book would ride along
with versions.
> As I see it -- and its a while since I've done this stuff so things may have since changed
-- in the way of an easy move to maven is our src/contrib content.  Maven would have these
as distinct projects pulling in their hbase dependency or, if you wanted to take on the maven
subproject notion, then, hbase would be at same level in build as the contribs -- it would
be a subproject too just built before the others.
> Anyone interested in working on this issue?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message