hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Vote on hbase-0.20.3RC1
Date Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:06:56 GMT
Sounds good to me. 



----- Original Message ----
> From: Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcryans@apache.org>
> To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, January 12, 2010 10:01:24 AM
> Subject: Re: Vote on hbase-0.20.3RC1
> 
> This RC is sinked! Can we target next Friday for a new one?
> 
> J-D
> 
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> > Yes, I agree.
> > Especially since Stack wants to wrap up 0.20.
> >
> > At some point I may want to backport HBASE-2108 into a 0.20.4, but we can 
> cross that bridge when/if.
> >
> >   - Andy
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >> From: Jean-Daniel Cryans 
> >> To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> >> Sent: Tue, January 12, 2010 9:45:12 AM
> >> Subject: Re: Vote on hbase-0.20.3RC1
> >>
> >> Alright I agree. Let's sink this release candidate? Anyone else in
> >> favor of getting those fixes in?
> >>
> >> J-D
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:31 PM, stack wrote:
> >> > -1
> >> >
> >> > The new indexed contrib. is not properly packaged.  Its missing 
> commons-lang
> >> > so it doesn't work in current RC (hbase-2112).  This is a little 
> unfortunate
> >> > since we broke the rules adding this fat new feature.  It might as well

> work
> >> > after all that (I should have caught this missing lib issue).
> >> >
> >> > I'd also like to get in hbase-2101, a fix for a dumb issue in
> >> > hfileoutputformat.
> >> >
> >> > There are a few other little issues that it'd be nice to get into 0.20.3
> >> > since, IMO, there'll not be a 0.20.4 on this branch since focus is (has
> >> > been) 0.21.
> >> >
> >> > Sorry for the hassle caused...
> >> > St.Ack
> >> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >



      


Mime
View raw message