hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "stack (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HBASE-2088) Review code base to purge wacky things done to compensate for lack of hdfs sync
Date Mon, 04 Jan 2010 04:22:58 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796072#action_12796072
] 

stack commented on HBASE-2088:
------------------------------

Look at WAL log sizes.  We were careful making sure we rotated frequently at < hdfs block
size.   Is this still needed?

We also did stuff like flush catalog tables at 1M or so.  Do we still do this?

> Review code base to purge wacky things done to compensate for lack of hdfs sync
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-2088
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2088
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: stack
>
> "Like we did with the compaction limiting thread and region server "safe mode" after
the transition to 0.20." apurtell

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message