hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Billy Pearson (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (HBASE-2053) Upper bound of outstanding WALs can be overrun
Date Fri, 25 Dec 2009 01:53:29 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Billy Pearson updated HBASE-2053:
---------------------------------

    Attachment: hbase-root-regionserver-server-2.log.2009-12-22.gz

Region server attached for a day
Might be some table flushes in there 
>From time to time I flush the whole table just to help clean out some logs in case of
a failed region server.

Hlog max = 24 and Hlog roll time = 5 mins

> Upper bound of outstanding WALs can be overrun
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-2053
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2053
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: stack
>         Attachments: hbase-root-regionserver-server-2.log.2009-12-22.gz
>
>
> Kevin Peterson up on hbase-user posted the following.  Of interest is the link on the
end which is logs of WAL rolls and removals.  In once place we remove 70plus logs because
the outstanding edits have moved passed the outstanding sequence numbers -- so our basic WAL
removal mechanism is working -- but if you study the log, the tendency is steady climb in
the number of logs.   HLog#cleanOldLogs needs to notice such an upward tendency and work more
aggressively cleaning the old in this case.  Here is Kevin's note:
> {code}
> n Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Kevin Peterson <x@y.com> wrote:
> This makes some sense now. I currently have 2200 regions across 3 tables. My
> largest table accounts for about 1600 of those regions and is mostly active
> at one end of the keyspace -- our key is based on date, but data only
> roughly arrives in order. I also write to two secondary indexes, which have
> no pattern to the key at all. One of these secondary tables has 488 regions
> and the other has 96 regions.
> We write about 10M items per day to the main table (articles). All of these
> get written to one of the secondary indexes (article-ids). About a third get
> written to the other secondary index. Total volume of data is about 10GB /
> day written.
> I think the key is as you say that the regions aren't filled enough to
> flush. The articles table gets mostly written to near one end and I see
> splits happening regularly. The index tables have no pattern so the 10
> millions writes get scattered across the different regions. I've looked more
> closely at a log file (linked below), and if I forget about my main table
> (which would tend to get flushed), and look only at the indexes, this seems
> to be what's happening:
> 1. Up to maxLogs HLogs, it doesn't do any flushes.
> 2. Once it gets above maxLogs, it will start flushing one region each time
> it creates a new HLog.
> 3. If the first HLog had edits for say 50 regions, it will need to flush the
> region with oldest edits 50 times before the HLog can be removed.
> If N is the number of regions getting written to, but not getting enough
> writes to flush on their own, then I think this converges to maxLogs + N
> logs on average. If I think of maxLogs as "number of logs to start flushing
> regions at" this makes sense.
> http://kdpeterson.net/paste/hbase-hadoop-regionserver-mi-prod-app35.ec2.biz360.com.log.2009-12-14
> {code}

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message