Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hbase-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10837 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2009 17:01:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Nov 2009 17:01:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 77682 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2009 17:01:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hbase-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77635 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2009 17:01:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hbase-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77623 invoked by uid 99); 15 Nov 2009 17:01:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:01:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:00:59 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99906234C045 for ; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 09:00:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1726040517.1258304439598.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:00:39 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andrew Purtell (JIRA)" To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HBASE-1984) Clearly document durability versus write performance tradeoff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Clearly document durability versus write performance tradeoff ------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HBASE-1984 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1984 Project: Hadoop HBase Issue Type: Task Reporter: Andrew Purtell Fix For: 0.21.0 Hadoop 0.21 now has a reliable append and flush feature and this gives us the opportunity to review some assumptions. The current situation: * Every edit going to a catalog table is flushed so there's no data loss. * The user tables edits are flushed every hbase.regionserver.flushlogentries which by default is 100. We should call out the durability versus write performance tradeoff in the flushlogentries description and up on the wiki somewhere, maybe on http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/PerformanceTuning . We should also provide two example configurations, one for performance (err on the performance side but not insane) and one for paranoia. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.