Mailing-List: contact hbase-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Message-ID: <1368773985.1258399239588.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:20:39 +0000 (UTC)
From: "stack (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (HBASE-1961) HBase EC2 scripts
In-Reply-To: <722272007.1257617733604.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12778461#action_12778461 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-1961:
------------------------------

Playing with scripts more:

+ Has hardcoded JAVA_VERSION in hbase-ec2-env.sh.  Is that intentional?
+ If I do the following, it doesn't work:

{code}
$ ./bin/hbase-ec2 list -h
Required option '-K, --private-key KEY' missing (-h for usage)
No running clusters.
{code}

The -h is not passed to ec2-describe-instances.  I see that the hadoop scripts have the same issue.  So it seems like we require people to fill in keys into the hbase-ec2-env.sh.  Is that right?  If so, lets add stuff to the readme?

> HBase EC2 scripts
> -----------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-1961
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1961
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>         Environment: Amazon AWS EC2
>            Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>            Assignee: Andrew Purtell
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.20.3
>
>         Attachments: ec2-contrib.tar.gz
>
>
> Attached tarball is a clone of the Hadoop EC2 scripts, modified significantly to start up a HBase storage only cluster on top of HDFS backed by instance storage. 
> Tested with the HBase 0.20 branch but should work with trunk also. Only the AMI create and launch scripts are tested. Will bring up a functioning HBase cluster. 
> Do "create-hbase-image c1.xlarge" to create an x86_64 AMI, or "create-hbase-image c1.medium" to create an i386 AMI.  Public Hadoop/HBase 0.20.1 AMIs are available:
>     i386: ami-c644a7af
>     x86_64: ami-f244a79b
> launch-hbase-cluster brings up the cluster: First, a small dedicated ZK quorum, specifiable in size, default of 3. Then, the DFS namenode (formatting on first boot) and one datanode and the HBase master. Then, a specifiable number of slaves, instances running DFS datanodes and HBase region servers.  For example:
> {noformat}
>     launch-hbase-cluster testcluster 100 5
> {noformat}
> would bring up a cluster with 100 slaves supported by a 5 node ZK ensemble.
> We must colocate a datanode with the namenode because currently the master won't tolerate a brand new DFS with only namenode and no datanodes up yet. See HBASE-1960. By default the launch scripts provision ZooKeeper as c1.medium and the HBase master and region servers as c1.xlarge. The result is a HBase cluster supported by a ZooKeeper ensemble. ZK ensembles are not dynamic, but HBase clusters can be grown by simply starting up more slaves, just like Hadoop. 
> hbase-ec2-init-remote.sh can be trivially edited to bring up a jobtracker on the master node and task trackers on the slaves.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.