Mailing-List: contact hbase-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <227781.87293.qm@web65515.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
References: <475316.13696.qm@web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
 <E9C6F5B134FDA3468879CB4E533CF1C803709D@TK5EX14MBXC111.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
Subject: Re: who's doing what for 0.21?
To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
In-Reply-To: 
 <E9C6F5B134FDA3468879CB4E533CF1C803709D@TK5EX14MBXC111.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-968963056-1245539301=:87293"

--0-968963056-1245539301=:87293
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I my opinion, we should not bother to wait for Avro. I've been hearing
about it on and off for three months now. If it is ready the day we
start work on 1015 for 0.21, and it fits the bill, fine, but otherwise
we should just use Thrift or pbufs. Thrift may be preferable as its
compact binary protocol is competitive with pbufs plus it has a fully
implemented async rpc stack. I think this applies for both 1015 and
1295. Also I'm skeptical that something to supplant RMI won't have
overheads related to that we don't need, e.g. transmitting class and
method names as strings, etc. 

   - Andy


________________________________
From: Jim Kellerman (POWERSET) <Jim.Kellerman@microsoft.com>
To: "hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 3:26:58 PM
Subject: RE: who's doing what for 0.21?

I am also interested in 1295 (I have quite a bit of experience
with cross data center replication), but more interested in
getting more of the master into zookeeper.

As for 1556, I might wait a bit. At the Cloudera off-site, one
of the things talked about was doing something similar for
Hadoop which we might leverage.

What really needs to get done around builds is when you mark
a Jira as patch available, we should do a patch build and test
like Hadoop does. Noone has had time to do it to date, but if
you are taking on the build, that would be a "nice to have".

For 1015, should you wait for Avro?

And if you missed it, here are the notes from the Cloudera off-site:
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/DeveloperOffsite20090612

---
Jim Kellerman, Powerset (Live Search, Microsoft Corporation)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Purtell [mailto:apurtell@apache.org]
> Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 12:11 PM
> To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: who's doing what for 0.21?
>
> http://tinyurl.com/m7nt72
>
> I have an interest in these:
>
>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1015
>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1295
>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1556
>
> I think for 1015 and 1295, there is interest on the part of at least
> myself,
> dj_ryan, and jgray. dj_ryan was saying something about su executives
> making
> 1295 a priority for him. We should figure out how to divide up and
> assign
> out the work.
>
> Also, probably I'll end up taking on the grunt work of 1556, because
> it
> needs to be done.
>
> Have we set a time and place for the next dev meeting?
>
>    - Andy
>


--0-968963056-1245539301=:87293--