Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hbase-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14820 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2009 00:31:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jun 2009 00:31:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 21495 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2009 00:31:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hbase-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21435 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2009 00:31:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hbase-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21409 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2009 00:31:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 00:31:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 00:31:28 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F90234C045 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:31:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1022584740.1245803467339.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:31:07 -0700 (PDT) From: "Andrew Purtell (JIRA)" To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HBASE-1576) TIF needs to be able to set scanner caching size for smaller row tables & performance In-Reply-To: <1069450229.1245790870072.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12723381#action_12723381 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-1576: --------------------------------------- Should the default also be upped to something like 30 as before, or even 100? > TIF needs to be able to set scanner caching size for smaller row tables & performance > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-1576 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1576 > Project: Hadoop HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: mapred > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: ryan rawson > Assignee: Andrew Purtell > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.20.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-1576.patch > > > TIF goes with the default scanner caching size (1). When each row is processed very fast and is small, this limits the overall performance. By setting a higher scanner caching level you can achieve 100x+ the performance with the exact same map-reduce and table. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.