hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jim Kellerman (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HBASE-1515) Address part of config option hbase.regionserver unnecessary
Date Sat, 13 Jun 2009 05:37:07 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719086#action_12719086
] 

Jim Kellerman commented on HBASE-1515:
--------------------------------------

I would like to keep it in until we know for sure. Cloudera may support HBase, but it has
to be able to work on EC2. Since EC2 instances can have both public and private addresses,
 both the port and IP addresses are necessary.

> Address part of config option hbase.regionserver unnecessary
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-1515
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1515
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Nitay Joffe
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.20.1
>
>
> We have a configuration option "hbase.regionserver" that specifies address + port the
region servers should bind to. I believe all of our users don't require the address part of
it and always leave it as 0.0.0.0. Most people rsync their configs to all the machines in
the cluster, so anything other than 0.0.0.0 doesn't really make sense.
> We should change this option into just hbase.regionserver.port, like we have with the
master now.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message