hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ryan rawson (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HBASE-1515) Address part of config option hbase.regionserver unnecessary
Date Sat, 13 Jun 2009 07:17:07 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719092#action_12719092

ryan rawson commented on HBASE-1515:

To run on EC2 and similar systems we now support the same configuration as hadoop:

    <description>The name of the Network Interface from which a master 
      should report its IP address.
    <description>The host name or IP address of the name server (DNS)
      which a master should use to determine the host name used 
      for communication and display purposes.

Setting IPs on each host for config is not really practical.  This is the scalable mechanism
that hadoop supports, and now we do as well!

> Address part of config option hbase.regionserver unnecessary
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-1515
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1515
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Nitay Joffe
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.20.1
> We have a configuration option "hbase.regionserver" that specifies address + port the
region servers should bind to. I believe all of our users don't require the address part of
it and always leave it as Most people rsync their configs to all the machines in
the cluster, so anything other than doesn't really make sense.
> We should change this option into just hbase.regionserver.port, like we have with the
master now.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message