hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew Purtell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HBASE-1410) compactions are not memory efficient
Date Tue, 12 May 2009 18:32:45 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12708554#action_12708554

Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-1410:

@Jonathan: Can that be done for 0.20 as part of 1304?

> compactions are not memory efficient 
> -------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-1410
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1410
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>             Fix For: 0.20.0
> Compactions read a lot of data into the heap. Prior to HBASE-1058 or successor issues,
it was possible to stack up hundreds if not thousands of flushes in a store. Eventually when
compaction is possible, no HRS has enough heap to commit for the compaction process and all
OOME as the region in question is (re)deployed. HBASE-1058 is not the ideal solution.This
issue suggests creating a memory efficient compaction process which can scale. 

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message