hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jim Kellerman (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HBASE-1304) New client server implementation of how gets and puts are handled.
Date Mon, 18 May 2009 18:12:45 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12710431#action_12710431
] 

Jim Kellerman commented on HBASE-1304:
--------------------------------------

> ryan rawson commented on HBASE-1304:
> ------------------------------------
> A few thoughts:
> 
> - It never makes sense to 'delete into the future' - imagine if you
> inserted data that was masked by a delete placed there X
> days/months/years before.  It would be confusing.

I agree. +1 on not deleting into the future. 

The exception to this rule is LATEST_TIMESTAMP which HRegion converts
to 'now'. If I read this (somewhat lengthy) discussion correctly, any
timestamp specified for a delete that does not exactly match a
timestamp for a cell, that delete will be ignored. Converting
LATEST_TIMESTAMP to 'now' will break if my reading is correct.

> In the end, I'm concerned about minor compactions removing deleted
> key/values - are we sure we want this behaviour?

I am not concerned with removing deleted key/values on a minor
compaction because as Erik points out, there is no way to undo a
delete. The delete record still needs to be written so that key/values
from older stores can be removed (along with the delete record) during
a major compaction.



> New client server implementation of how gets and puts are handled. 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-1304
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1304
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.20.0
>            Reporter: Erik Holstad
>            Assignee: Jonathan Gray
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.20.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-1304-ryan.patch, hbase-1304-v1.patch, HBASE-1304-v2.patch,
HBASE-1304-v3.patch, HBASE-1304-v4.patch, HBASE-1304-v5.patch, HBASE-1304-v6.patch, HBASE-1304-v7.patch
>
>
> Creating an issue where the implementation of the new client and server will go. Leaving
HBASE-1249 as a discussion forum and will put code and patches here.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message