hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rong-En Fan (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HBASE-953) Reevaluate HBASE-288 block caching work; should it be enabled always?
Date Sat, 25 Oct 2008 07:03:44 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12642599#action_12642599
] 

Rong-En Fan commented on HBASE-953:
-----------------------------------

So, you are talking about using smaller block size in block cache or hdfs block size?

> Reevaluate HBASE-288 block caching work; should it be enabled always?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-953
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-953
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: stack
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.19.0
>
>
> Go back and take another look at the Tom White work.  We've gotten boost in writing and
scanning because of J-D work.  HBASE-288 looks like it boosts sequential reads and perhaps
random read a little.  Take another look.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message