hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rong-en Fan" <gra...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [ANN] hbase-0.2.0 Release Candidate 2
Date Thu, 07 Aug 2008 01:39:22 GMT
okay, then I would vote +1 after stack's explanation.

On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 1:52 AM, stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> Jim Kellerman wrote:
>>
>> -1 With the late inclusion of HBASE-796, there are a number of examples in
>> javadoc that still reference Text, and I found (without an exhaustive
>> search) classes that still have un-deprecated methods that accept text:
>> e.g., HColumnDescriptor, HMsg, HBaseAdmin, BatchUpdate. There may be more.
>>
>
> This is a bug for sure -- Its what I get for rushing in a change at last
> minute -- but I'd venture that the fact that we're missing a few
> @deprecated's in javadoc should be considered a minor issue and shouldn't
> sink the RC.  I'd think that the many @deprecateds in HTable sufficient to
> convey the general notion that methods taking Text are going to be removed
> in the next release.
>
> Verifying RCs takes time.  We've gotten in two +1s at this point.  I know
> that in at least one case, it took some substantial effort on the part of
> the voter validating the candidate.  Would be grand if we could avoid
> another RC cycle.
>
> How about we let this RC progress and if sufficient votes, release it as
> 0.2.0 in spite of the above bug.  Meantime I'll make a new issue to fix the
> missing @deprecateds and file it for inclusion in 0.2.1?
>
> Thanks Jim,
> St.Ack
>
>
>> My opinion: either back out 796 for 0.2.0 (because 0.3.0 will only address
>> a handful of bugs before hadoop-0.19 is out there) and include 796 in 0.3.0,
>> removing the deprecated methods in 0.4.0 (tied to hadoop-0.19) or going
>> through 0.2.0 with a fine tooth comb and changing examples that use Text and
>> finishing the deprecating of methods.
>>
>> ---
>> Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: stack [mailto:stack@duboce.net]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 2:43 PM
>>> To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
>>> Subject: [ANN] hbase-0.2.0 Release Candidate 2
>>>
>>> This is the second 0.2.0 release candidate.  It is available
>>> for download here:
>>>
>>>  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.2.0-candidate-2/
>>>
>>> Please take this candidate for test drive.  Check the
>>> documentation, that unit tests all complete on your platform, etc.
>>>
>>> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.2.0?  Vote yes or
>>> no before Friday, August 8th.
>>>
>>> See [4] below for list of fixes since RC1.  Thanks to all
>>> involved testing and fixing bugs in this second RC.
>>>
>>> Yours,
>>> The HBase Team
>>>
>>> P.S. Release 0.2.0 has over 250 issues resolved [1] since the
>>> branch for
>>> 0.1 hbase was made.  Be warned that hbase 0.2.0 is not
>>> backward compatible with the hbase 0.1 API.  See [2] Izaak
>>> Rubins' notes on the high-level API differences between 0.1
>>> and 0.2.  For notes on how to migrate your 0.1 era hbase data
>>> to 0.2, see Izaak's migration guide [3].  To run 0.2.0 on
>>> hadoop 0.18.0, replace the 0.17.1 jars under $HBASE_HOME/lib
>>> with their 0.18.x equivalents and then recompile.
>>>
>>> 1.
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version
>>>
>>
>> =12312955&styleName=Html&projectId=12310753&Create=Create
>>
>>>
>>> 2. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/Plan-0.2/APIChanges
>>> 3. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HowToMigrate
>>> 4.
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?rese
>>>
>>
>> t=true&&pid=12310753&updated%3Aprevious=-1w+3d&status=5&status=6>
>> &sorter/field=updated&sorter/order=DESC
>>
>>>
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
>>> Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.12/1592 - Release
>>> Date: 8/5/2008 6:03 AM
>>>
>>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message