hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "stack (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HBASE-613) Timestamp-anchored scanning fails to find all records
Date Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:12:45 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12606012#action_12606012
] 

stack commented on HBASE-613:
-----------------------------

How does the requested timestamp effect the lookup of region in .META.?  I'd think there should
be no timestamping in the mix when you are trying to figure which region holds wanted row?

> Timestamp-anchored scanning fails to find all records
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-613
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-613
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: client
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: Jim Kellerman
>             Fix For: 0.2.0
>
>         Attachments: nogood.patch, TestTimestampScanning.java, Timestamp.patch
>
>
> If I add 3 versions of a cell and then scan across the first set of added cells using
a timestamp that should only get values from the first upload, a bunch are missing (I added
100k on each of the three uploads).  I thought it the fact that we set the number of cells
found back to 1 in HStore when we move off current row/column but that doesn't seem to be
it.  I also tried upping the MAX_VERSIONs on my table and that seemed to have no effect. 
Need to look closer.
> Build a unit test because replicating on cluster takes too much time.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message