hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jim Kellerman (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HBASE-478) offlining of table does not run reliably
Date Mon, 05 May 2008 21:53:55 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12594356#action_12594356
] 

Jim Kellerman commented on HBASE-478:
-------------------------------------

I removed the table delete because enable/disable are asychronous and might not be deterministic
for a test case. Given that this table is so small, that may not be an issue, on the other
hand, it doesn't test much either since we generally needed a table of 30-40 regions to get
enable/disable to fail.

I can put back the table delete if you want, preceded by a disable. I don't have a strong
opinion either way. Your call.

> offlining of table does not run reliably
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-478
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-478
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.2.0, 0.1.2, 0.1.1
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: Jim Kellerman
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.1.2
>
>         Attachments: 478-0.1-v2.patch, 478-0.1.patch
>
>
> I have a table of 4 regions made w/ PE.  I cannot reliably offline it.  I'm using 'disable
TestTable' and have traced it to ensure its not a problem in hql.    What I see is that one
region will get the offlined mark or maybe two.. but never all.
> Jim in IRC suggested that if we did the .TABLE. catalog table, offlining the entry there
might be more reliable than trying to offline all regions in a table.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message