hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Kellerman <...@powerset.com>
Subject RE: [VOTE] Release hbase 0.1.0 (Candidate 2)
Date Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:11:56 GMT
FWIW: PE with clients = 8 runs in 1.5G (does not run in 1.0 or 1.25)

---
Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bryan Duxbury [mailto:bryan@rapleaf.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 2:31 PM
> To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release hbase 0.1.0 (Candidate 2)
>
> +1
>
> On Mar 27, 2008, at 1:38 PM, stack wrote:
>
> > +1 on release.
> >
> > I did load tests and checked the documentation looks good.
> >
> > This candidate may run worse than recent hbases' under load.  I got
> > NSREs and timeout failures when running with 8 concurrent clients
> > using PE but it completed PE random and sequential Writes with 4
> > concurrent clients -- the test I use to figure whether to vote on a
> > hadoop candidate.
> >
> > This candidate would have been better with a fix for HBASE-505
> > included but we can add that later and make a 0.1.1 in a week or so.
> >
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> >
> > stack wrote:
> >> Here is a third candidate (candidate count is zero-based).
> >> Candidate 1 bundle was corrupt.
> >>
> >> Please download and try it out:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.0-candidate-2/
> >>
> >> Does this candidate work for you?  Do unit tests pass on your
> >> hardware?  Is the documentation sufficient?
> >>
> >> Should we release this?  I'll leave the vote close at
> Thursday, March
> >> 27th.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> St.Ack
> >
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.1/1346 - Release
> Date: 3/27/2008 10:03 AM
>
>

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.1/1346 - Release Date: 3/27/2008 10:03 AM


Mime
View raw message