From issues-return-19071-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@hawq.apache.org Thu Sep 20 10:33:05 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B48F180679 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 10:33:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 28154 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2018 08:33:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hawq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hawq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hawq.apache.org Received: (qmail 28115 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2018 08:33:03 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:33:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id EF9CDC0635 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:33:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -110.301 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.301 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38OBUDcHvoaU for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:33:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id B3DE45F533 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B135DE1013 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:33:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3992B23F9C for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:33:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:33:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Kuien Liu (JIRA)" To: issues@hawq.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HAWQ-1660) optimize parquet scan MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-1660?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kuien Liu updated HAWQ-1660: ---------------------------- Priority: Minor (was: Major) > optimize parquet scan > --------------------- > > Key: HAWQ-1660 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-1660 > Project: Apache HAWQ > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Storage > Reporter: Kuien Liu > Assignee: Radar Lei > Priority: Minor > > I saw Mr. Wen Lin's work on bloomfilter, and push down the fitler into parquet scan. It provide a chance to accelerate further, that is: read the hash-key-attributes first and perform filter, if positive, fetch the remaining columns from parquet. does it make sense? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)