hawq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Lei Chang <chang.lei...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Questions for HAWQ dev community: Pluggable storage formats and files systems vs. PXF profiles
Date Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:34:54 GMT
Hi Ed,

Thanks for bringing this out. The framework part of the pluggable storage
format has been committed, but the plugins still need some development work
and take some time.


On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:35 PM, Ed Espino <espino@apache.org> wrote:

> As HAWQ has matured, the introduction of the Pluggable storage formats is
> giving users two methods to access external data. Is the project at a point
> where we can advise the community that we will recommend the use of the Pluggable
> storage format instead of PXF? I believe this was discussed in a thread
> earlier in the year but I haven't seen any further discussion or action
> plan of action for it.
> I suggest we recommend HAWQ community users start the migration and upon
> graduation the project should indicate we will stop supporting PXF in favor
> of the Pluggable storage formats. Thoughts? Depending on feedback, I would
> like to put this to a vote for the dev community's consideration.
> email ref: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
> 3a1e5c358bc0b0ecf04d49e38979d6bf0ae21e3a56188d34986fc8a5@%
> 3Cdev.hawq.apache.org%3E
> For reference, PXF is also in use and under active development in another
> open source project: Greenplum Database ( https://github.com/greenplum-
> db/gpdb/tree/5X_STABLE/gpAux/extensions/pxf ) and depends on the PXF
> server-side components that exist in HAWQ’s source tree.
> Thanks,
> -=e

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message