hawq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shivram Mani <shivram.m...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: License Header info
Date Tue, 31 Jan 2017 03:24:11 GMT
Good to know. Thanks !

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Paul Guo <paulguo@gmail.com> wrote:

> Unless the license header could not be practically added (e.g. .ans files
> for test).
> You will need to add the file(s) in pom.xml to avoid RAT check for this
> case.
>
> 2017-01-28 5:07 GMT+08:00 Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>:
>
> > Actually, you really are required to apply license header to every file
> > nowdays.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Roman.
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Shivram Mani <shivram.mani@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > In that case, can we just apply the license header to every file ?
> > > These files in question are configurations which would also be
> controlled
> > > by Mgmt tools such as Ambari.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 8:50 AM, David Yozie <dyozie@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> We had the same question around the docs source files.  Seems like
> > there's
> > >> roughly an even split of projects that do/don't include the license in
> > each
> > >> file.
> > >>
> > >> -David
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Shivram Mani <shivram.mani@gmail.com
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Are we supposed to add the Apache License header comment to every
> > file in
> > >> > the hawq repo ?
> > >> > Currently the classpath files under
> > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-hawq/tree/master/
> > >> > pxf/pxf-service/src/main/resources
> > >> > don't have the header info.
> > >> > Is that something we need to add to those files as well ?
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > shivram mani
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > shivram mani
> >
>



-- 
shivram mani

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message