Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94CC0200BF4 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 02:03:11 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 932BE160B27; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 01:03:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id DDC87160B26 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 02:03:10 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 75144 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2016 01:03:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hawq.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hawq.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hawq.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75133 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2016 01:03:10 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 01:03:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A3486C1099 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 01:03:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.019 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.019 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=2, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.999] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ATRH_bARPRQw for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 01:03:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with SMTP id 10B9E5F1B3 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 01:03:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75105 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2016 01:03:07 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 01:03:07 +0000 Received: from mail-qk0-f179.google.com (mail-qk0-f179.google.com [209.85.220.179]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 0F4FD1A028B for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 01:03:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f179.google.com with SMTP id t184so130705641qkd.0 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 17:03:06 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIyyUfade9RiyMwexbCUHAM6vysxN/4Q877PrtSuxXRShs7HwEp2qUmNXLwk3ozCqohO6lyS+nBvW8ywRTp X-Received: by 10.55.169.21 with SMTP id s21mr8730270qke.246.1482454986135; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 17:03:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Vineet Goel Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 01:02:54 +0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION NEEDED: 2.1.0.0-incubating - what to do with unresolved JIRAs To: dev@hawq.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c06f362d87a15054448f295 archived-at: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 01:03:11 -0000 --94eb2c06f362d87a15054448f295 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Agree with Ruilong. And for JIRA owners, please remember to update the Fix Version when you close a JIRA. There are many JIRAs which are resolved/closed but Fix Version = Backlog, which is very confusing for a someone looking to see which release has the fix. On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:52 PM Ruilong Huo wrote: > As these issues are not resolved, I think it is more reasonable to mark the > affected version as 2.1.0.0-incubating and make fix version as backlog. > Then the correct fix version can be marked at the time when the issue is > actually resolved. > > Best regards, > Ruilong Huo > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Lei Chang wrote: > > > Sounds a good idea! > > > > Cheers > > Lei > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:50 AM, Ed Espino wrote: > > > > > We have a significant number of JIRAs opened and currently with a fix > > > version of 2.1.0.0-incubating. As this is a source only release, I am > > > inclined to start the branch/tagging release process and update these > > JIRAs > > > with the next release version (2.2.0.0-incubating currently available). > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > HAWQ 2.1.0.0-incubating (Open, In Progress, Reopened) > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-1232?filter=12339113 > > > > > > Thanks, > > > -=e > > > > > > FYI: Although we may change the version for the next release, I am > using > > > this as a place holder for the next release JIRAs. > > > > > > -- > > > *Ed Espino* > > > *espino@apache.org * > > > > > > --94eb2c06f362d87a15054448f295--