hawq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache HAWQ 2.0.0.0-incubating RC3
Date Wed, 21 Sep 2016 08:52:06 GMT
FYI: the two issues related to the Perl Artistic License have been resolved
in both 2.0.0.0-incubating and master branches:

Remove ASF Category X incompatible JSON Perl Module (Artistic license)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-1062

Declare PL/Perl's ppport.h source file to be an Artistic License exception.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-1065

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 2:47 AM, Ed Espino <espino@apache.org> wrote:
> > I have been reviewing the licensing of ppport.h.  It is generated header
> > file from Devel::PPPort - Perl/Pollution/Portability (
> > http://search.cpan.org/~wolfsage/Devel-PPPort-3.32/PPPort.pm).  The file
> > came to us from the original PostgreSQL source code base.  Interestingly,
> > there is this note on the project page:
> >
> > How to use ppport.h
> >
> > Don't direct the users of your module to download Devel::PPPort. They are
> > most probably no XS writers. Also, don't make ppport.h optional. Rather,
> > just take the most recent copy of ppport.h that you can find (e.g. by
> > generating it with the latest Devel::PPPort release from CPAN), copy it
> > into your project, adjust your project to use it, and distribute the
> header
> > along with your module.
> >
> >
> > Is it possible this file can be an exception under the following jira:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-79?
> >
> > I also noticed the Apache HTTP Request Library (
> > http://httpd.apache.org/apreq) project also ships with it's own ppport.h
> > file generated in a similar way (
> > https://github.com/apache/apreq/blob/trunk/glue/perl/xsbuilder/ppport.h
> ).
> >
> > @Roman or @Justin, can you provide some guidance on how to proceed with
> > this file?
>
> See my suggestion above. On top of that, the podling needs to decide
> whether
> bundling Artistic/Perl code into its code base is so important that we
> need to
> spin ASF legal wheels in motion and ask for a formal classification of the
> Artistic/Perl license.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>



-- 
*Ed Espino*
*espino@apache.org <espino@apache.org>*

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message