hawq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Guo <paul...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Vote] Shrink a Git Repository
Date Tue, 13 Sep 2016 02:33:07 GMT
Does this affect an existing cloned repo (i.e. do we need to re-clone a
fresh repo if we want to check in something)?

Does this affect "git checkout $tag"? (I need to rebase to an old release.)

2016-09-12 18:36 GMT+08:00 Ming Li <mli@apache.org>:

> Hi Ed,
>
> Here I just delete below large files from git repo, the contents in these
> file cannot be retrieved anymore( but all these files are useless in
> current build process), however git log is still there.
>
> Below is all file lists removed. Please review them and point out if they
> are in use.  Thanks
> ------------------------ Current removed  ------------------------
> All sizes are in kB. The pack column is the size of the object, compressed,
> inside the pack file.
> size   pack   SHA                                       location
> 42707  8921   eb59c507535698b76e67d4965814e417fbdacde9
>  goh/ext/rhel5_x86_64/lib/libmadlib.so
> 22879  22283  bb2673f70c88573c45ea4ffa59da69e517aa2ba5
>  repo/Pivotal/libhdfs3/1.2.1-rc1/targzs/libhdfs3-rhel5_x86_
> 64-1.2.1-rc1.targz
> 12939  12450  a33fb9101505ab2475861d50b4b1ad9ec4da811a
>  repo/Pivotal/libhdfs3/1.2.1-rc1/targzs/libhdfs3-osx106_
> x86-1.2.1-rc1.targz
> 11077  10890  878971186fde916bab67555bc65ac4dcf662b5f8
>  pxf/tools/pxfd/pxfd-1.0-1.noarch.rpm
> 11019  10989  ec7c1e1a8d76f78c1222230ac13dbbbe8c5acc57
>  pxf/tools/pxfd/rpmbuild/SOURCES/pxfd.tar.gz
> 7573   1722   ab532846e72d24f11066e7c7f248d03d2fbbe8fa
>  depends/thirdparty/orc/examples/expected/demo-12-zlib.jsn.gz
> 5618   1836   b4f773943dea27e443abe0ee8bec0679de989e9b
> gpcc/WIN32/gpcc.ncb
> 5182   1016   1031f7d3f70ff48f674927cf486c95e0f9166860
>  goh/ext/osx105_x86/lib/libmadlib.so
> 5027   122    1d1d714a846259ec5b2b0471e55eec94efd7671d
>  depends/thirdparty/orc/examples/demo-11-none.orc
> 3685   3669   7c71d14c0fcca416444cda1b0673158b71011973
>  gpcc/ext/openssl-0.9.8r.tar.gz
> 1806   283    1e60f847659633dd4308a21f8d0b5c163cc519a0
>  releng/ereport/ereport.txt
> 1802   1796   97447c5120c7d2f1e738dbe6886cb58609ce739f
>  tools/bin/pythonSrc/epydoc-3.0.1.tar.gz
> 1750   314    271bb9448ee8c7baf13db19ada4d99a7c5b418eb
>  releng/ereport/ereport.txt
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Ed Espino <espino@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > -1 Need more information.  What is the impact (are any useful files
> lost)?
> > Are any files removed?
> >
> > -=e
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Ming Li <mli@pivotal.io> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I heard from someone complain about the slowness to git clone hawq
> repo.
> > > And we have almost finished large code modification for apache
> release, I
> > > think it is opt time for us to shrink git repo size now.
> > >
> > > I followed the steps in
> > > http://stevelorek.com/how-to-shrink-a-git-repository.html, deleted
> some
> > > large file which is not useful in current build process,  it can reduce
> > > size from 174M to 100M.
> > >
> > > However it need all clone to be re-clone again after git push the
> changed
> > > repo. So I am writing this email to ask for voting it.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Ed Espino*
> > *espino@apache.org <espino@apache.org>*
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message